Result
2:0
31/07/2025 at 08:30 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Hagen, clay - 1/8-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 13 | 3 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 3 | 1 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 64% | 68% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 76% (29/38) | 57% (24/42) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 57% (12/21) | 30% (6/20) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 75% (3/4) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 43% (18/42) | 24% (9/38) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 70% (14/20) | 43% (9/21) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 40% (4/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Winners |
|---|
| 29 | 15 |
| Unforced Errors |
|---|
| 21 | 26 |
| Net Points Won |
|---|
| 76% (13/17) | 43% (3/7) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 69% (41/59) | 48% (30/62) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 52% (32/62) | 31% (18/59) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 60% (73/121) | 40% (48/121) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 8 | 2 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 89% (8/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 50% (4/8) | 11% (1/9) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 71% (12/17) | 29% (5/17) |
Chances of winning
Botic Van De Zandschulp
86.2% | Daniel Masur
13.8% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Botic Van De Zandschulp has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+4.9%)Daniel Masur has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-4.9%)
Botic Van De Zandschulp - Daniel Masur Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.11 ↓
(1.15) |
|
6.48 ↑
(5) |
5.4%
(7%) | |
What is the prediction for Botic Van De Zandschulp - Daniel Masur?
Users Predictions:
4 users predict this event. Van De Zandschulp will win (votes: 2 - 50%). Masur will win (votes: 2 - 50%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Van De Zandschulp is ranked ATP: 87. Masur is ranked ATP: 539.
- Van De Zandschulp is showing really good form (last 5 games: 4 wins).
- Masur has been unpredictable lately (in the last 5 games, wins – 3).
- Van De Zandschulp may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- In this match, Van De Zandschulp is the undisputed favorite.
- In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
How many head-to-head matches has Botic Van De Zandschulp won against Daniel Masur?
Botic Van De Zandschulp has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Daniel Masur won against Botic Van De Zandschulp?
Daniel Masur has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Botic Van De Zandschulp - Daniel Masur were as follows:
Latest results of Botic Van De Zandschulp
Latest results of Daniel Masur
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Van De Zandschulp B. (1) | Mikrut L. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Engel J. | Masur D. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Blanch D. (LL) | Negritu Ch. | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Villanueva G. (Q) | Den Ouden G. (6) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Kym J. (4) | Coppejans K. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Reis Da Silva J. | Cecchinato M. (Alt) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Sanchez Jover C. | Nagal S. (Alt) | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | McDonald N. (WC) | Rodionov J. (9) | 2 : 0 |
| 9 | Choinski J. (5) | Giustino L. | 2 : 1 |
| 10 | Popko D. | Matusevich A. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Skatov T. | Donski A. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 12 | Hara Friend J. D. (CO) | Hanfmann Y. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Hassan B. (8) | Tabur C. | 0 : 2 |
| 14 | Wallin O. (Q) | Schoenhaus M. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 15 | Kestelboim M. (Q) | Schwaerzler J. J. (NG) | 1 : 2 |
| 16 | Midon L. | Gaubas V. (2) | 1 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Van De Zandschulp B. (1) | Masur D. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Negritu Ch. | Den Ouden G. (6) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Kym J. (4) | Cecchinato M. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Nagal S. | McDonald N. | 1 : 2 |
| 5 | Choinski J. (5) | Popko D. | 2 : 1 |
| 6 | Skatov T. | Hanfmann Y. (3) | 1 : 2 |
| 7 | Tabur C. | Wallin O. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Schwaerzler J. J. | Gaubas V. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Van De Zandschulp B. (1) | Den Ouden G. (6) | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Kym J. (4) | McDonald N. | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Choinski J. (5) | Hanfmann Y. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Wallin O. | Gaubas V. (2) | 2 : 0 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Den Ouden G. (6) | Kym J. (4) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Hanfmann Y. (3) | Wallin O. | 2 : 0 |
Final| 1 | Den Ouden G. (6) | Hanfmann Y. (3) | 1 : 2 |
