Result
2:1
31/08/2025 at 04:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Cassis - Qualification, hard - Semi-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 8 | 10 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 7 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 61% | 66% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 79% (53/67) | 73% (51/70) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 57% (24/42) | 50% (18/36) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 100% (5/5) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 27% (19/70) | 21% (14/67) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (18/36) | 43% (18/42) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/5) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 71% (77/109) | 65% (69/106) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 35% (37/106) | 29% (32/109) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 53% (114/215) | 47% (101/215) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 8 | 2 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 100% (16/16) | 82% (14/17) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 18% (3/17) | 0% (0/16) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 58% (19/33) | 42% (14/33) |
Chances of winning
Olaf Pieczkowski
87.1% | Matteo Covato
12.9% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Olaf Pieczkowski has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+8.2%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Olaf Pieczkowski's performance.Matteo Covato has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-8.2%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Matteo Covato might be facing challenges that affect their performance.
Olaf Pieczkowski - Matteo Covato Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.07 ↓
(1.18) |
|
7.21 ↑
(4.39) |
7.2%
(7.9%) | |
Preview Facts
- Pieczkowski is ranked ATP: 476. Covato is ranked ATP: 920.
- Pieczkowski has been quite unpredictable recently (last 5 games: 2 wins).
- Covato is on a losing streak (in the last 5 games, wins – 0).
- Pieczkowski may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- In this match, Pieczkowski is a strong favorite.
- Recently, there has been no match between the players.
How many head-to-head matches has Olaf Pieczkowski won against Matteo Covato?
Olaf Pieczkowski has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Matteo Covato won against Olaf Pieczkowski?
Matteo Covato has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Olaf Pieczkowski - Matteo Covato were as follows:
Latest results of Olaf Pieczkowski
Latest results of Matteo Covato
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Halys Q. (1) | Glinka D. (Alt) | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Stewart H. (Q) | Added D. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Fery A. | Geerts M. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Pieczkowski O. (Q) | Droguet T. (5) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Rodionov J. (4) | Martineau M. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Bertrand R. | Butvilas E. | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Poullain L. | Mmoh M. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Chidekh C. | Vacherot V. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Skatov T. (6) | Escoffier A. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Paire B. (WC) | Malige M. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 11 | De Schepper K. (Q) | Coulibaly E. | 1 : 2 |
| 12 | Moroni F. (LL) | Harris B. (3) | 1 : 2 |
| 13 | Gueymard Wayenburg S. (7) | Donnet E. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 14 | Paul J. (Q) | Engel J. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | Paris T. | Wallin O. (Alt) | 2 : 1 |
| 16 | Janvier M. (Q) | Lajal M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Glinka D. | Stewart H. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Fery A. | Droguet T. (5) | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Rodionov J. (4) | Bertrand R. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Mmoh M. | Vacherot V. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Escoffier A. | Malige M. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Coulibaly E. | Harris B. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Donnet E. | Engel J. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Paris T. | Lajal M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Glinka D. | Fery A. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Rodionov J. (4) | Vacherot V. (8) | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Malige M. | Harris B. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Engel J. | Lajal M. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Glinka D. | Rodionov J. (4) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Harris B. (3) | Engel J. | 2 : 1 |
Final| 1 | Glinka D. | Harris B. (3) | 1 : 2 |
