Result
2:0
10/10/2025 at 17:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Fairfield, hard - Quarter-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 3 | 2 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 1 | 3 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 57% | 63% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 87% (26/30) | 63% (25/40) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 74% (17/23) | 57% (13/23) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 38% (15/40) | 13% (4/30) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 43% (10/23) | 26% (6/23) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 81% (43/53) | 60% (38/63) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 40% (25/63) | 19% (10/53) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 59% (68/116) | 41% (48/116) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 8 | 2 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 100% (9/9) | 67% (6/9) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/9) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 67% (12/18) | 33% (6/18) |
Chances of winning
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
60.1% | Daniel Milavsky
39.9% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Jay Dylan Hara Friend has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+13.4%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Jay Dylan Hara Friend's performance.Daniel Milavsky has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-13.4%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Daniel Milavsky might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Jay Dylan Hara Friend than the current prediction. (-12.3%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Jay Dylan Hara Friend that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Daniel Milavsky than the current prediction. (+12.3%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Daniel Milavsky could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Jay Dylan Hara Friend - Daniel Milavsky Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.56 ↓
(1.96) |
|
2.38 ↑
(1.72) |
6.2%
(9.2%) | |
What is the prediction for Jay Dylan Hara Friend - Daniel Milavsky?
High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Hara Friend (votes: 1 - 100%).
Users Predictions:
Jay Dylan Hara Friend will win
(12 of 14 users predict this - 85.71%).
Confidence interval (95%): 67.38% – 100%. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Hara Friend is ranked ATP: 743. Milavsky is ranked ATP: 435.
- Hara Friend is undoubtedly in great shape (last 5 games: 4 wins).
- Milavsky's form has been unstable in recent games (in the last 5 games, wins – 3).
- Milavsky may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
How many head-to-head matches has Jay Dylan Hara Friend won against Daniel Milavsky?
Jay Dylan Hara Friend has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Daniel Milavsky won against Jay Dylan Hara Friend?
Daniel Milavsky has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Jay Dylan Hara Friend - Daniel Milavsky were as follows:
Latest results of Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Latest results of Daniel Milavsky
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Hassan B. (1) | Colson T. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Ilagan A. | Bigun K. (JR) | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Rolland D. (WC) | McKennon M. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Zink T. | Bouzige M. (7) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Gengel M. (3) | Bynoe E. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Wallin O. | Winter E. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | van Loben Sels E. (WC) | Pascual Ferra R. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Artnak B. | Shelbayh A. (5) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Rosenkranz M. (6) | McCormick T. | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Braswell M. (PR) | Tarvet O. | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Kingsley C. (Alt) | Fenty A. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 12 | Sekulic P. | Johns G. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Mmoh M. (8) | Vandecasteele Q. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Shah A. | Hara Friend J. D. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | Milavsky D. | King D. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Wiskandt M. | Popko D. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Hassan B. (1) | Ilagan A. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Rolland D. | Zink T. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Gengel M. (3) | Winter E. | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Pascual Ferra R. | Shelbayh A. (5) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Rosenkranz M. (6) | Braswell M. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Fenty A. | Johns G. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Mmoh M. (8) | Hara Friend J. D. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Milavsky D. | Popko D. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Ilagan A. | Rolland D. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Winter E. | Shelbayh A. (5) | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Rosenkranz M. (6) | Johns G. (4) | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Hara Friend J. D. | Milavsky D. | 2 : 0 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Ilagan A. | Winter E. | |
| 2 | Johns G. (4) | Hara Friend J. D. | |
Final
