Yannik Kelm vs Daniel De Jonge – Schedule & Where to Watch on TV

Result
1:2
17/02/2026 at 06:00 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
  • ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 The Hague, hard - 1/16-finals

Match Stats

Last 10 balls
23

Chances of winning


Yannik Kelm
37.6%
Daniel De Jonge
62.4%

Initial Probability

(when we started the analysis)
36.9% 63.1%

Our Initial ML Estimation

35.2% 64.8%


Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:

  • Yannik Kelm has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+0.7%)
  • Daniel De Jonge has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-0.7%)
  • ML Model estimates a lower probability for Yannik Kelm than the current prediction. (-2.4%)
  • ML Model estimates a higher probability for Daniel De Jonge than the current prediction. (+2.4%)
  • Yannik Kelm - Daniel De Jonge Odds

    1 X 2 Marga
    Avarage Now
    (Initially)
    2.47
    (2.5)

    1.49
    (1.47)
    7.5%
    (8.3%)
    What is the prediction for Yannik Kelm - Daniel De Jonge?
  • Over/Under & Asian Handicap Predictions by High ROI users:
    • AH +3.5 Games - Kelm (1.84) (votes: 1 - 100%) .
  • Overall votes from High ROI Users Predictions (including all markets): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Kelm (votes: 1 - 100%).
  • The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
  • Preview Facts
    • Kelm is ranked ATP: 829. De Jonge is ranked ATP: 773.
    • Kelm has been quite unpredictable recently (last 5 games: 2 wins).
    • De Jonge is in superb shape, having picked up a string of victories recently (last 5 games: 5 wins).
    • De Jonge may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
    • De Jonge might have a minor edge in this game.
    • We predict that De Jonge will win today's game, with odds of 1.43.
    • Recently, the players have not faced each other.
    Latest results of Yannik Kelm
    Latest results of Daniel De Jonge
    Draw
    2026

    1/16-finals
    1Vasa E. (1)Bozemoj B.2 : 1
    2Braynin A.Paldanius O.0 : 2
    3Alam P.Khoeblal E.2 : 0
    4Mueller C.Knaff A. (5)0 : 2
    5Deckers A. (4)Schell N.2 : 1
    6Rivera L.Van Sambeek F.2 : 1
    7Von der Schulenburg J.Schifris J.0 : 2
    8Petkovic M.Handel T. (6)2 : 1
    9Demin Y. (8)De Lange P.2 : 0
    10De Jager J.Naw H.0 : 2
    11Boogaard T.Larwig N.2 : 0
    12Wassermann D. (RET.)Planinsek F. J. (3)0 : 1
    13Matusevich A. (7)Paardekooper S.2 : 1
    14Kisimov D.Jong S.1 : 2
    15Kelm Y.De Jonge D.1 : 2
    16Grumet G.Visker N. (2)0 : 2

    1/8-finals
    1Vasa E. (1)Paldanius O.1 : 2
    2Alam P.Knaff A. (5)1 : 2
    3Deckers A. (4)Rivera L.2 : 0
    4Schifris J.Petkovic M.0 : 2
    5Demin Y. (8)Naw H.2 : 0
    6Boogaard T.Planinsek F. J. (3)2 : 0
    7Matusevich A. (7)Jong S.2 : 0
    8De Jonge D.Visker N. (2)0 : 2

    Quarter-finals
    1Paldanius O.Knaff A. (5)2 : 1
    2Deckers A. (4)Petkovic M.0 : 2
    3Demin Y. (8)Boogaard T.0 : 2
    4Matusevich A. (7)Visker N. (2)2 : 0

    Semi-finals
    1Paldanius O.Petkovic M.0 : 2
    2Boogaard T.Matusevich A. (7)1 : 2

    Final
    1Petkovic M.Matusevich A. (7)1 : 2