Result
2:0
01/04/2026 at 11:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- WTA - SINGLES: Charleston, clay - 1/16-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 3 | 0 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 6 | 1 |
| 1st serve percentage |
|---|
| 70% | 62% |
| 1st serve points won |
|---|
| 71% (30/42) | 48% (14/29) |
| 2nd serve points won |
|---|
| 33% (6/18) | 33% (6/18) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 5/6 | 4/9 |
| 1st return points won |
|---|
| 62% (18/29) | 29% (12/42) |
| 2nd return points won |
|---|
| 67% (12/18) | 67% (12/18) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 5/9 | 1/6 |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 60% (36/60) | 41% (18/44) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 59% (26/44) | 40% (24/60) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 60% (62/104) | 40% (42/104) |
| Last 10 balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match points saved |
|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| Service games won |
|---|
| 88% (7/8) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return games won |
|---|
| 71% (5/7) | 13% (1/8) |
| Total games won |
|---|
| 80% (12/15) | 20% (3/15) |
Chances of winning
McCartney Kessler
55.1% | Janice Tjen
44.9% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
McCartney Kessler has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+7.6%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in McCartney Kessler's performance.Janice Tjen has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-7.6%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Janice Tjen might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for McCartney Kessler than the current prediction. (-7%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with McCartney Kessler that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Janice Tjen than the current prediction. (+7%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Janice Tjen could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
McCartney Kessler - Janice Tjen Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.73 ↓
(1.97) |
|
2.12 ↑
(1.78) |
5%
(6.9%) | |
What is the prediction for McCartney Kessler - Janice Tjen?
Users Predictions:
7 users predict this event. Kessler will win (votes: 4 - 57.1%). Tjen will win (votes: 3 - 42.9%). High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Tjen (votes: 1 - 100%). Over/Under & Asian Handicap Predictions by High ROI users:- AH +1.5 Sets - Tjen (3.23) (votes: 1 - 100%) .
- AH -1.5 Sets - Tjen (1.48) (votes: 1 - 100%) .
Overall votes from High ROI Users Predictions (including all markets): 3 high ROI users predict this event. Tjen (votes: 3 - 100%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Kessler is ranked WTA: 53. Tjen is ranked WTA: 41.
- In recent matches, Kessler has shown inconsistent form (last 5 games: 2 wins).
- Tjen is currently in poor form (in the last 5 games, wins – 1).
- Tjen may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- The chances of victory for both players are nearly identical in this match.
- Recently, the players have not faced each other.
How many head-to-head matches has McCartney Kessler won against Janice Tjen?
McCartney Kessler has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Janice Tjen won against McCartney Kessler?
Janice Tjen has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between McCartney Kessler - Janice Tjen were as follows:
Latest results of McCartney Kessler
Latest results of Janice Tjen
Draw
Singles - Main1/32-finals| 1 | Pegula J. (1) | Bye | |
| 2 | Putintseva Y. | Sun L. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Sherif M. | Yuan Y. (LL) | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Bye | Cocciaretto E. (14) | |
| 5 | Fernandez L. (9) | Bye | |
| 6 | Kudermetova P. (Q) | Oliynykova O. | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Lys E. | Volynets K. | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Bye | Shnaider D. (7) | |
| 9 | Jovic I. (4) | Bye | |
| 10 | Parks A. | Stoiana M. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Andreescu B. (WC) | Galfi D. | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Bye | Kenin S. (16) | |
| 13 | Sakkari M. (10) | Bye | |
| 14 | Day K. (Q) | Badosa P. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Tomova V. (Q) | Brady J. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Bye | Kalinskaya A. (8) | |
| 17 | Keys M. (5) | Bye | |
| 18 | Tomljanovic A. | Vekic D. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 19 | Vidmanova D. (LL) | Bondar A. | 0 : 2 |
| 20 | Bye | Frech M. (11) | |
| 21 | Bejlek S. (13) | Bye | |
| 22 | Sierra S. (RET.) | Urhobo A. (Q) | 0 : 1 |
| 23 | Zakharova A. | Yastremska D. | 0 : 2 |
| 24 | Bye | Bencic B. (3) | |
| 25 | Stearns P. (17) | Bye | |
| 26 | Krueger A. | McNally C. | 2 : 1 |
| 27 | Kalieva E. (LL) | Kessler M. | 1 : 2 |
| 28 | Bye | Tjen J. (12) | |
| 29 | Baptiste H. (15) | Bye | |
| 30 | Stephens S. (WC) | Zarazua R. | 0 : 2 |
| 31 | Zhang S. | Starodubtseva Y. | 0 : 2 |
| 32 | Bye | Gorgodze E. (LL) | |
1/16-finals| 1 | Pegula J. (1) | Putintseva Y. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Yuan Y. | Cocciaretto E. (14) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Fernandez L. (9) | Kudermetova P. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Volynets K. | Shnaider D. (7) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Jovic I. (4) | Parks A. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Andreescu B. | Kenin S. (16) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Sakkari M. (10) | Badosa P. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Tomova V. | Kalinskaya A. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Keys M. (5) | Vekic D. | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Bondar A. | Frech M. (11) | 2 : 0 |
| 11 | Bejlek S. (13) | Urhobo A. | 2 : 0 |
| 12 | Yastremska D. | Bencic B. (3) | 1 : 2 |
| 13 | Stearns P. (17) | Krueger A. | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Kessler M. | Tjen J. (12) | 2 : 0 |
| 15 | Baptiste H. (15) | Zarazua R. | 1 : 2 |
| 16 | Starodubtseva Y. | Gorgodze E. (LL) | 2 : 1 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Pegula J. (1) | Cocciaretto E. (14) | |
| 2 | Fernandez L. (9) | Shnaider D. (7) | |
| 3 | Jovic I. (4) | Kenin S. (16) | |
| 4 | Badosa P. | Kalinskaya A. (8) | |
| 5 | Keys M. (5) | Bondar A. | |
| 6 | Bejlek S. (13) | Bencic B. (3) | |
| 7 | Stearns P. (17) | Kessler M. | |
| 8 | Zarazua R. | Starodubtseva Y. | |
Quarter-finalsSemi-finalsFinal
