Result
1:2
07/09/2025 at 16:45 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Winston Salem - Qualification, hard - Semi-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 7 | 4 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 3 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 72% | 65% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 77% (48/62) | 74% (46/62) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 38% (9/24) | 55% (18/33) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 40% (2/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 26% (16/62) | 23% (14/62) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 45% (15/33) | 63% (15/24) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 50% (2/4) | 60% (3/5) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 65% (53/82) | 67% (64/95) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 33% (31/95) | 35% (29/82) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 47% (84/177) | 53% (93/177) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 4 | 6 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 2 | 1 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 79% (11/14) | 87% (13/15) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 13% (2/15) | 21% (3/14) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 45% (13/29) | 55% (16/29) |
Chances of winning
Andrew Delgado
35.9% | Strong Kirchheimer
64.1% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Andrew Delgado has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-14.1%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Andrew Delgado's form might have worsened.Strong Kirchheimer has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+14.1%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting Strong Kirchheimer's recent form is better than expected.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Andrew Delgado than the current prediction. (+17.8%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests a strong performance forecast for Andrew Delgado, possibly due to key factors that the model accounted for.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Strong Kirchheimer than the current prediction. (-17.8%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests a potential downturn for Strong Kirchheimer, possibly due to injuries or other negative factors.
Andrew Delgado - Strong Kirchheimer Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
2.6 ↑
(1.86) |
|
1.45 ↓
(1.86) |
7.3%
(7.5%) | |
What is the prediction for Andrew Delgado - Strong Kirchheimer?
Users Predictions:
9 users predict this event. Delgado will win (votes: 5 - 55.6%). Kirchheimer will win (votes: 4 - 44.4%).
Confidence interval (95%) for Delgado: 23.1% – 88.1%.High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Kirchheimer (votes: 1 - 100%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- Delgado is ranked ATP: 951. Kirchheimer is ranked ATP: 637.
- Delgado is showing really good form (last 5 games: 4 wins).
- Kirchheimer has been struggling lately (in the last 5 games, wins – 1).
- Kirchheimer may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- The chances of victory for both players are nearly identical in this match.
- In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
How many head-to-head matches has Andrew Delgado won against Strong Kirchheimer?
Andrew Delgado has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Strong Kirchheimer won against Andrew Delgado?
Strong Kirchheimer has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Andrew Delgado - Strong Kirchheimer were as follows:
Latest results of Andrew Delgado
Latest results of Strong Kirchheimer
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Ficovich J. P. (1) | Langmo C. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Blanch Dar. | Shelbayh A. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | van Loben Sels E. (WC) | Damm M. | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Ghibaudo A. | Johns G. (6) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Pinnington Jones J. (4) | Bouzige M. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Vandecasteele Q. (Q) | Trotter J. K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Kim A. (CO) | Matsuda R. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Bicknell B. (PR) | Monday J. (5) | 2 : 1 |
| 9 | Maloney P. (8) | Pow L. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Jodar R. | Goode G. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 11 | Winter E. (Q) | Perez A. | 1 : 2 |
| 12 | Zink T. | Krueger M. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Rybakov A. (7) | Kwiatkowski T. S. (PR) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Ilagan A. | Svajda T. | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | Sekulic P. (PR) | Milavsky D. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Williams C. (Q) | Cassone M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Langmo C. | Blanch Dar. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Damm M. | Ghibaudo A. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Pinnington Jones J. (4) | Vandecasteele Q. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Kim A. | Bicknell B. | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Pow L. (RET.) | Jodar R. | 0 : 1 |
| 6 | Perez A. | Krueger M. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Rybakov A. (7) | Svajda T. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Sekulic P. | Cassone M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Langmo C. | Ghibaudo A. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Pinnington Jones J. (4) | Kim A. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Jodar R. | Krueger M. (3) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Svajda T. | Cassone M. (2) | 2 : 0 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Langmo C. | Pinnington Jones J. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Jodar R. | Svajda T. | 0 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Pinnington Jones J. (4) | Svajda T. | 2 : 0 |
