Result
2:0
18/02/2025 at 06:40 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
- ATP - SINGLES: Doha (Qatar), hard - 1/16-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 3 | 1 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 2 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 72% | 53% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 74% (32/43) | 59% (20/34) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 53% (9/17) | 47% (14/30) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 50% (2/4) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 41% (14/34) | 26% (11/43) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 53% (16/30) | 47% (8/17) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 40% (4/10) | 50% (2/4) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 68% (41/60) | 53% (34/64) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 47% (30/64) | 32% (19/60) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 57% (71/124) | 43% (53/124) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 82% (9/11) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 40% (4/10) | 18% (2/11) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 62% (13/21) | 38% (8/21) |
Chances of winning
Botic Van De Zandschulp
79.1% | Abedallah Shelbayh
20.9% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Botic Van De Zandschulp has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+8.2%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Botic Van De Zandschulp's performance.Abedallah Shelbayh has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-8.2%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Abedallah Shelbayh might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Botic Van De Zandschulp than the current prediction. (-9.4%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Botic Van De Zandschulp that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Abedallah Shelbayh than the current prediction. (+9.4%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Abedallah Shelbayh could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Botic Van De Zandschulp - Abedallah Shelbayh Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.2 ↓
(1.34) |
|
4.55 ↑
(3.27) |
5.2%
(5.2%) | |
What is the prediction for Botic Van De Zandschulp - Abedallah Shelbayh?
Users Predictions:
7 users predict this event. Van De Zandschulp will win (votes: 3 - 42.9%). Shelbayh will win (votes: 4 - 57.1%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Let's watch a game between leader and an outsider (ranked 23 in the zone Relegation ~ National League and 1 in the zone Promotion ~ League One).
- Last 5 head-to-head matches Morecambe won 2.
- Two teams are playing changeable.
- Walsall could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
- In this match Walsall is a favorite.
- Last 8 head-to-head matches Morecambe won 4 matches, drawn 1 matches, lost 3 matches and goals 9:7 (average 1.1:0.9).
- Including matches at home between the teams Morecambe won 2 matches, drawn 1 matches, lost 1 matches and goals 5:3 (average 1.3:0.8).
How many head-to-head matches has Botic Van De Zandschulp won against Abedallah Shelbayh?
Botic Van De Zandschulp has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Abedallah Shelbayh won against Botic Van De Zandschulp?
Abedallah Shelbayh has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Botic Van De Zandschulp - Abedallah Shelbayh were as follows:
Latest results of Botic Van De Zandschulp
Latest results of Abedallah Shelbayh
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Alcaraz C. (1) | Cilic M. (PR) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Zhang Z. | Nardi L. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Marozsan F. | Dougaz A. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Lehecka J. | Dimitrov G. (7) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Djokovic N. (3) | Berrettini M. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Struff J-L. | Griekspoor T. | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | O'Connell C. (Q) | Habib H. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Popyrin A. | Draper J. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Tsitsipas S. (6) | Medjedovic H. (SE) | 1 : 2 |
| 10 | Halys Q. (Q) | Auger-Aliassime F. | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Bergs Z. | Bautista-Agut R. | 2 : 0 |
| 12 | Khachanov K. | Medvedev D. (4) | 1 : 2 |
| 13 | Rublev A. (5) | Bublik A. | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Virtanen O. (LL) | Borges N. | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Van De Zandschulp B. (Q) | Shelbayh A. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Safiullin R. | De Minaur A. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Alcaraz C. (1) | Nardi L. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Marozsan F. | Lehecka J. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Berrettini M. | Griekspoor T. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | O'Connell C. | Draper J. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Medjedovic H. | Auger-Aliassime F. (WO.) | |
| 6 | Bergs Z. | Medvedev D. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Rublev A. (5) | Borges N. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Van De Zandschulp B. | De Minaur A. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Alcaraz C. (1) | Lehecka J. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Berrettini M. | Draper J. (8) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Auger-Aliassime F. | Medvedev D. (RET.) (4) | 1 : 0 |
| 4 | Rublev A. (5) | De Minaur A. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Lehecka J. | Draper J. (8) | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Auger-Aliassime F. | Rublev A. (5) | 1 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Draper J. (8) | Rublev A. (5) | 1 : 2 |
