Result
0:2
18/08/2024 at 16:50 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- ATP - SINGLES: Winston-Salem (USA), hard - 1/32-finals
Match Stats
| |
---|
Aces |
---|
1 | 3 |
Double Faults |
---|
2 | 3 |
1st Serve Percentage |
---|
64% | 45% |
1st Serve Points Won |
---|
56% (9/16) | 80% (12/15) |
2nd Serve Points Won |
---|
56% (5/9) | 50% (9/18) |
Break Points Saved |
---|
0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
1st Return Points Won |
---|
20% (3/15) | 50% (8/16) |
2nd Return Points Won |
---|
50% (9/18) | 44% (4/9) |
Break Points Converted |
---|
100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
Winners |
---|
3 | 5 |
Unforced Errors |
---|
9 | 7 |
Net Points Won |
---|
80% (4/5) | 40% (2/5) |
Max Points In Row |
---|
5 | 6 |
Service Points Won |
---|
54% (13/24) | 65% (20/31) |
Return Points Won |
---|
35% (11/31) | 46% (11/24) |
Total Points Won |
---|
44% (24/55) | 56% (31/55) |
Max Games In Row |
---|
3 | 5 |
Service Games Won |
---|
60% (3/5) | 80% (4/5) |
Return Games Won |
---|
20% (1/5) | 40% (2/5) |
Total Games Won |
---|
40% (4/10) | 60% (6/10) |
Chances of winning
Botic Van De Zandschulp 47.9% | Arthur Cazaux 52.1% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Botic Van De Zandschulp has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+7.3%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Botic Van De Zandschulp's performance.Arthur Cazaux has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-7.3%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Arthur Cazaux might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Botic Van De Zandschulp than the current prediction. (-6.3%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Botic Van De Zandschulp that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Arthur Cazaux than the current prediction. (+6.3%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Arthur Cazaux could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Botic Van De Zandschulp - Arthur Cazaux Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now (Initially) |
1.98 ↓ (2.31) |
|
1.83 ↑ (1.58) |
5.1% (6.6%) | |
What is the prediction for Botic Van De Zandschulp - Arthur Cazaux?
Users Predictions:
31 users predict this event. Van De Zandschulp will win (votes: 13 - 41.9%). Cazaux will win (votes: 18 - 58.1%).
Confidence interval (95%) for Cazaux: 40.7% – 75.5%. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- Van De Zandschulp is ranked ATP: 75. Cazaux is ranked ATP: 93.
- Two players are playing changeable.
- Cazaux could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
- In this match the chances to achieve triumph for both players are almost equal.
- Last 1 head-to-head matches Van De Zandschulp won 0 matches, drawn 0 matches, lost 1 matches and goals 0-2.
How many head-to-head matches has Botic Van De Zandschulp won against Arthur Cazaux?
Botic Van De Zandschulp has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Arthur Cazaux won against Botic Van De Zandschulp?
Arthur Cazaux has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Botic Van De Zandschulp - Arthur Cazaux were as follows:
Latest results of Botic Van De Zandschulp
Latest results of Arthur Cazaux
Draw
Singles - Main1/32-finals1 | Baez S. (1) | Bye | |
2 | Coric B. | Nagal S. | 2 : 0 |
3 | Van De Zandschulp B. | Cazaux A. | 0 : 2 |
4 | Bye | Hijikata R. (16) | |
5 | Rinderknech A. (12) | Bye | |
6 | O'Connell C. | Kirchheimer S. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
7 | Goffin D. | Munar J. | 2 : 1 |
8 | Bye | Darderi L. (5) | |
9 | Cerundolo F. (3) | Bye | |
10 | Djere L. | Svajda Z. (LL) | 0 : 2 |
11 | Muller A. (Alt) | Lestienne C. | 2 : 0 |
12 | Bye | Kotov P. (15) | |
13 | Sonego L. (10) | Bye | |
14 | Coria F. | Stricker D. (PR) | 0 : 2 |
15 | Comesana F. | Shang J. | 0 : 2 |
16 | Bye | Navone M. (7) | |
17 | Borges N. (8) | Bye | |
18 | Seyboth Wild T. | Duckworth J. | 2 : 1 |
19 | Tien L. (Q) | Schoolkate T. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
20 | Bye | Marozsan F. (9) | |
21 | Shevchenko A. (13) | Bye | |
22 | Kumar O. (Q) | Carreno-Busta P. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
23 | Evans D. | Vukic A. | 1 : 2 |
24 | Bye | Mannarino A. (4) | |
25 | Etcheverry T. M. (6) | Bye | |
26 | Bergs Z. | Opelka R. (WC) | 2 : 1 |
27 | Daniel T. | Fucsovics M. | 1 : 2 |
28 | Bye | Michelsen A. (11) | |
29 | Gaston H. (14) | Bye | |
30 | Eubanks C. (WC) | Walton A. | 2 : 1 |
31 | Mejia N. (LL) | Moutet C. | 0 : 2 |
32 | Bye | Safiullin R. (17) | |
1/16-finals1 | Baez S. (1) | Coric B. | 0 : 2 |
2 | Cazaux A. | Hijikata R. (16) | 1 : 2 |
3 | Rinderknech A. (12) | O'Connell C. | 2 : 0 |
4 | Goffin D. | Darderi L. (5) | 2 : 0 |
5 | Cerundolo F. (3) | Svajda Z. | 0 : 2 |
6 | Muller A. | Kotov P. (15) | 1 : 2 |
7 | Sonego L. (10) | Stricker D. | 2 : 0 |
8 | Shang J. | Navone M. (7) | 2 : 0 |
9 | Borges N. (8) | Seyboth Wild T. | 0 : 2 |
10 | Tien L. | Marozsan F. (9) | 2 : 1 |
11 | Shevchenko A. (13) | Carreno-Busta P. | 0 : 2 |
12 | Vukic A. | Mannarino A. (4) | 2 : 1 |
13 | Etcheverry T. M. (6) | Bergs Z. | 1 : 2 |
14 | Fucsovics M. | Michelsen A. (11) | 0 : 2 |
15 | Gaston H. (14) | Eubanks C. | 0 : 2 |
16 | Moutet C. | Safiullin R. (17) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals1 | Coric B. | Hijikata R. (16) | 1 : 2 |
2 | Rinderknech A. (12) | Goffin D. | 0 : 2 |
3 | Svajda Z. | Kotov P. (15) | 1 : 2 |
4 | Sonego L. (WO.) (10) | Shang J. | |
5 | Seyboth Wild T. | Tien L. | 0 : 2 |
6 | Carreno-Busta P. | Vukic A. | 2 : 1 |
7 | Bergs Z. | Michelsen A. (11) | 0 : 2 |
8 | Eubanks C. | Safiullin R. (17) | 2 : 1 |
Quarter-finals1 | Hijikata R. (16) | Goffin D. | 0 : 2 |
2 | Kotov P. (15) | Sonego L. (10) | 0 : 2 |
3 | Tien L. | Carreno-Busta P. | 0 : 2 |
4 | Michelsen A. (11) | Eubanks C. | 2 : 1 |
Semi-finals1 | Goffin D. | Sonego L. (10) | 0 : 2 |
2 | Carreno-Busta P. (RET.) | Michelsen A. (11) | 0 : 1 |
Final1 | Sonego L. (10) | Michelsen A. (11) | 2 : 0 |