Result
2:1
17/07/2025 at 05:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- ATP - SINGLES: Bastad, clay - 1/8-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 8 | 3 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 71% | 66% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 67% (59/88) | 74% (46/62) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (18/36) | 50% (16/32) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 85% (11/13) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 31% (19/62) | 33% (29/88) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (16/32) | 50% (18/36) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 50% (2/4) | 15% (2/13) |
| Winners |
|---|
| 29 | 40 |
| Unforced Errors |
|---|
| 32 | 46 |
| Net Points Won |
|---|
| 75% (9/12) | 74% (17/23) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 62% (77/124) | 66% (63/95) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 34% (32/95) | 38% (47/124) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (109/219) | 50% (110/219) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 88% (15/17) | 88% (14/16) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 13% (2/16) | 12% (2/17) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 52% (17/33) | 48% (16/33) |
Chances of winning
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
47.8% | Botic Van De Zandschulp
52.2% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Camilo Ugo Carabelli has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-7.5%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Camilo Ugo Carabelli's form might have worsened.Botic Van De Zandschulp has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+7.5%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting Botic Van De Zandschulp's recent form is better than expected.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Camilo Ugo Carabelli than the current prediction. (+11.5%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests a strong performance forecast for Camilo Ugo Carabelli, possibly due to key factors that the model accounted for.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Botic Van De Zandschulp than the current prediction. (-11.5%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests a potential downturn for Botic Van De Zandschulp, possibly due to injuries or other negative factors.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli - Botic Van De Zandschulp Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
2 ↑
(1.72) |
|
1.83 ↓
(2.13) |
4.8%
(5.1%) | |
What is the prediction for Camilo Ugo Carabelli - Botic Van De Zandschulp?
Users Predictions:
10 users predict this event. Ugo Carabelli will win (votes: 5 - 50%). Van De Zandschulp will win (votes: 5 - 50%).
Confidence interval (95%) for Ugo Carabelli: 19% – 81%.High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 3 high ROI users predict this event. Ugo Carabelli (votes: 1 - 33.3%). Van De Zandschulp (votes: 2 - 66.7%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- Ugo Carabelli is ranked ATP: 59. Van De Zandschulp is ranked ATP: 100.
- Ugo Carabelli is currently in poor form (last 5 games: 1 wins).
- Van De Zandschulp has been unpredictable lately (in the last 5 games, wins – 3).
- Van De Zandschulp may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- In this match, both players are almost equally likely to win.
- In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
How many head-to-head matches has Camilo Ugo Carabelli won against Botic Van De Zandschulp?
Camilo Ugo Carabelli has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Botic Van De Zandschulp won against Camilo Ugo Carabelli?
Botic Van De Zandschulp has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Camilo Ugo Carabelli - Botic Van De Zandschulp were as follows:
Latest results of Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Latest results of Botic Van De Zandschulp
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Cerundolo F. (1) | Bye | |
| 2 | Barrios Vera T. | Navone M. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Gaston H. | Tseng C. H. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Ofner S. | Dzumhur D. (7) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Baez S. (4) | Bye | |
| 6 | Monteiro T. (Q) | Budkov Kjaer N. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 7 | Ymer E. (WC) | Boyer T. | 2 : 1 |
| 8 | Collignon R. | Darderi L. (6) | 1 : 2 |
| 9 | Ugo Carabelli C. (5) | Garin C. | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Ymer M. (WC) | Van De Zandschulp B. | 0 : 2 |
| 11 | Misolic F. (Q) | Moller E. | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Bye | Borges N. (3) | |
| 13 | Kopriva V. (8) | Dellien H. (RET.) | 1 : 0 |
| 14 | Rejchtman Vinciguerra W. (WC) | De Jong J. | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Pellegrino A. (Q) | Faria J. | 2 : 1 |
| 16 | Bye | Griekspoor T. (2) | |
1/8-finals| 1 | Cerundolo F. (1) | Navone M. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Gaston H. | Dzumhur D. (7) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Baez S. (4) | Budkov Kjaer N. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Ymer E. | Darderi L. (6) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Ugo Carabelli C. (5) | Van De Zandschulp B. | 2 : 1 |
| 6 | Misolic F. | Borges N. (3) | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Kopriva V. (8) | De Jong J. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Pellegrino A. | Griekspoor T. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Cerundolo F. (1) | Dzumhur D. (7) | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Baez S. (4) | Darderi L. (6) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Ugo Carabelli C. (5) | Misolic F. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | De Jong J. | Griekspoor T. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Cerundolo F. (1) | Darderi L. (6) | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Ugo Carabelli C. (5) | De Jong J. | 0 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Darderi L. (6) | De Jong J. | 2 : 1 |
