Result
1:2
29/01/2026 at 08:45 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Manama, hard - 1/8-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 9 | 5 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 1 | 4 |
| 1st serve percentage |
|---|
| 69% | 61% |
| 1st serve points won |
|---|
| 68% (47/69) | 75% (52/69) |
| 2nd serve points won |
|---|
| 52% (16/31) | 51% (23/45) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 40% (2/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st return points won |
|---|
| 26% (18/69) | 32% (22/69) |
| 2nd return points won |
|---|
| 49% (22/45) | 48% (15/31) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 25% (1/4) | 60% (3/5) |
| Winners |
|---|
| 40 | 30 |
| Unforced errors |
|---|
| 41 | 36 |
| Net points won |
|---|
| 65% (13/20) | 63% (12/19) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 65% (62/96) | 66% (75/114) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 34% (39/114) | 35% (34/96) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 48% (101/210) | 52% (109/210) |
| Last 10 balls |
|---|
| 3 | 7 |
| Match points saved |
|---|
| 1 | 0 |
| Service games won |
|---|
| 80% (12/15) | 94% (15/16) |
| Return games won |
|---|
| 6% (1/16) | 20% (3/15) |
| Total games won |
|---|
| 42% (13/31) | 58% (18/31) |
Chances of winning
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
69.8% | Stefano Travaglia
30.2% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Chak Lam Coleman Wong - Stefano Travaglia Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.34 ↓
(1.5) |
|
3.07 ↑
(2.46) |
7.1%
(7.6%) | |
What is the prediction for Chak Lam Coleman Wong - Stefano Travaglia?
Users Predictions:
4 users predict this event. Wong will win (votes: 4 - 100%). High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): Chak Lam Coleman Wong will win (8 of 8 users predict this - 100%) 🥈 Silver Tip. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Wong is ranked ATP: 132. Travaglia is ranked ATP: 191.
- Recent performances by Wong have been up and down (last 5 games: 3 wins).
- Travaglia may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- Wong will hold a modest advantage in this match.
- The players have not played against each other recently.
How many head-to-head matches has Chak Lam Coleman Wong won against Stefano Travaglia?
Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Stefano Travaglia won against Chak Lam Coleman Wong?
Stefano Travaglia has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Chak Lam Coleman Wong - Stefano Travaglia were as follows:
Latest results of Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Latest results of Stefano Travaglia
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Sinclair C. (LL) | Samuel T. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Pankin S. (Q) | Pieczkowski O. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Homberg M. (Q) | Ouakaa A. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Blanch D. | Fomin S. (8) | 1 : 2 |
| 5 | Bar Biryukov P. (RET.) (3) | Zakaria F. | 1 : 1 |
| 6 | Bobichon M. (Q) | Dzhavakian Y. (Alt) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Ritschard A. | Albot R. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Berkieta T. (JR) | Kellovsky D. (LL) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Brunclik P. (6) | Summers M. (LL) | 2 : 1 |
| 10 | Naw H. (PR) | Xilas I. | 0 : 2 |
| 11 | Agafonov E. | Basic M. | 0 : 2 |
| 12 | Ehrenschneider N. (Alt) | Erhard M. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Binda A. (9) | Melnic V. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 14 | Maguire C. (WC) | Marrero Curbelo I. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Niklas-Salminen P. (Q) | Vasa E. | 0 : 2 |
| 16 | Bakshi A. | Simakin I. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Samuel T. | Pankin S. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Homberg M. | Fomin S. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Zakaria F. | Bobichon M. | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Ritschard A. | Kellovsky D. | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Brunclik P. (6) | Xilas I. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Basic M. | Erhard M. (4) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Melnic V. | Marrero Curbelo I. | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Vasa E. | Simakin I. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Samuel T. | Fomin S. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Bobichon M. | Ritschard A. | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Brunclik P. (6) | Basic M. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Marrero Curbelo I. | Simakin I. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Samuel T. | Bobichon M. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Brunclik P. (6) | Simakin I. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Samuel T. | Simakin I. (2) | 2 : 0 |
