Result
0:2
07/02/2026 at 20:50 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Brisbane 2 - Qualification, hard - Semi-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 0 | 13 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 0 | 2 |
| 1st serve percentage |
|---|
| 76% | 67% |
| 1st serve points won |
|---|
| 63% (22/35) | 79% (38/48) |
| 2nd serve points won |
|---|
| 73% (8/11) | 58% (14/24) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 0% (0/2) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st return points won |
|---|
| 23% (11/48) | 37% (13/35) |
| 2nd return points won |
|---|
| 42% (10/24) | 27% (3/11) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 0% (0/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| Winners |
|---|
| 9 | 30 |
| Unforced errors |
|---|
| 19 | 28 |
| Net points won |
|---|
| 100% (2/2) | 83% (5/6) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 64% (29/45) | 71% (48/68) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 29% (20/68) | 36% (16/45) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 43% (49/113) | 57% (64/113) |
| Last 10 balls |
|---|
| 4 | 6 |
| Match points saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service games won |
|---|
| 78% (7/9) | 100% (10/10) |
| Return games won |
|---|
| 0% (0/10) | 22% (2/9) |
| Total games won |
|---|
| 37% (7/19) | 63% (12/19) |
Chances of winning
Chase Ferguson
35.5% | Jamie Mackenzie
64.5% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Chase Ferguson has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-14.4%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Chase Ferguson's form might have worsened.Jamie Mackenzie has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+14.4%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting Jamie Mackenzie's recent form is better than expected.
Chase Ferguson - Jamie Mackenzie Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
2.66 ↑
(1.85) |
|
1.46 ↓
(1.85) |
6.2%
(8.3%) | |
Preview Facts
- Ferguson is ranked ATP: 688. Mackenzie is ranked ATP: 1095.
- Ferguson has been quite unpredictable recently (last 5 games: 3 wins).
- Mackenzie may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- In this match, both players have almost equal chances to win.
- Recently, the players have not faced each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Chase Ferguson won against Jamie Mackenzie?
Chase Ferguson has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Jamie Mackenzie won against Chase Ferguson?
Jamie Mackenzie has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Chase Ferguson - Jamie Mackenzie were as follows:
Latest results of Chase Ferguson
Latest results of Jamie Mackenzie
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Mackenzie J. (LL) | Polmans M. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Matsuoka H. | Delaney Ja. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Marinkov P. (WC) | Zhang Z. | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Hewitt C. (WC) | Uchiyama Y. (9) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Sakamoto R. (3) | Mochizuki Y. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Sinclair C. (Q) | Hulme M. (LL) | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Tu L. | Nakagawa N. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 8 | Ellis B. | Sun F. (7) | 2 : 1 |
| 9 | Blanch Dar. (8) | Denolly C. | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Weber A. | Jorda Sanchis D. | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Jasika O. | Shiraishi H. | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Isomura K. (Q) | Bolt A. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Zhou Y. (6) | Sach T. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 14 | Bouzige M. | Moriya H. | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Dellavedova M. (Q) | Imamura M. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 16 | Daniel T. | Sweeny D. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Polmans M. | Matsuoka H. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Zhang Z. | Uchiyama Y. (9) | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Sakamoto R. (3) | Sinclair C. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Tu L. | Ellis B. | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Blanch Dar. (8) | Weber A. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Jasika O. (RET.) | Bolt A. (4) | 0 : 1 |
| 7 | Sach T. | Moriya H. | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Imamura M. | Sweeny D. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Matsuoka H. | Zhang Z. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Sakamoto R. (3) | Tu L. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Blanch Dar. (8) | Bolt A. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Moriya H. | Sweeny D. (2) | 2 : 0 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Zhang Z. | Sakamoto R. (3) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Bolt A. (4) | Moriya H. | 2 : 1 |
Final| 1 | Zhang Z. | Bolt A. (4) | 2 : 0 |
