Result
1:2
15/06/2025 at 06:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Nottingham - Qualification, grass - Final
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 6 | 7 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 73% | 63% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 75% (39/52) | 79% (45/57) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 58% (11/19) | 53% (18/34) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 67% (4/6) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 21% (12/57) | 25% (13/52) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (17/34) | 42% (8/19) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 17% (1/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 70% (50/71) | 68% (63/92) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 32% (29/92) | 30% (21/71) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 48% (79/163) | 52% (84/163) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 85% (11/13) | 93% (13/14) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 7% (1/14) | 15% (2/13) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 44% (12/27) | 56% (15/27) |
Chances of winning
Colton Smith
71.5% | James Kent Trotter
28.5% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Colton Smith has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+13%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Colton Smith's performance.James Kent Trotter has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-13%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and James Kent Trotter might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Colton Smith than the current prediction. (-10.8%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Colton Smith that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for James Kent Trotter than the current prediction. (+10.8%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that James Kent Trotter could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Colton Smith - James Kent Trotter Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.31 ↓
(1.59) |
|
3.28 ↑
(2.24) |
7.1%
(7.5%) | |
What is the prediction for Colton Smith - James Kent Trotter?
High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Trotter (votes: 1 - 100%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is .
Preview Facts
- Smith is ranked ATP: 144. Trotter is ranked ATP: 202.
- Both players have been playing unpredictably.
- Trotter may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- In this match, Smith is seen as the favorite.
- In the last 2 head-to-head matches, Smith won 0 matches, drew 0 matches, lost 2 matches, and goals 2:4. (average 1:2).
How many head-to-head matches has Colton Smith won against James Kent Trotter?
Colton Smith has won 0 of their last 1 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has James Kent Trotter won against Colton Smith?
James Kent Trotter has won 1 of their last 1 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Colton Smith - James Kent Trotter were as follows:
01.11.2024
Colton Smith
-
James Kent Trotter
1:2
Latest results of Colton Smith
Latest results of James Kent Trotter
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | McCabe J. (Q) | Loffhagen G. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Trungelliti M. (SE) | Smith C. (LL) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Pinnington Jones J. (WC) | Nava E. | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Peniston R. (WC) | Galan D. E. (5) | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Holt B. (3) | Faria J. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Spizzirri E. (LL) | Choinski J. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 7 | Herbert P. | Mochizuki S. (SE) | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Krueger M. | Boyer T. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Cazaux A. (7) | Mannarino A. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Landaluce M. | Budkov Kjaer N. (NG) | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Atmane T. | Gigante M. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Fognini F. | Fery A. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Trotter J. K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Schoolkate T. | Blockx A. | 2 : 0 |
| 15 | Harris L. (PR) | Royer V. | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Grenier H. (Q) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | McCabe J. | Smith C. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Nava E. | Peniston R. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Faria J. | Choinski J. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Mochizuki S. | Boyer T. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Mannarino A. | Landaluce M. | 1 : 2 |
| 6 | Atmane T. | Fery A. | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Schoolkate T. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Harris L. (RET.) | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Smith C. | Nava E. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Faria J. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Landaluce M. | Atmane T. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Smith C. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Landaluce M. | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Mochizuki S. | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
