Result
1:2
17/06/2025 at 10:10 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Nottingham, grass - 1/16-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 5 | 26 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 11 | 2 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 61% | 71% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 74% (55/74) | 84% (66/79) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 48% (23/48) | 45% (15/33) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 82% (9/11) | 100% (9/9) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 20% (16/79) | 26% (19/74) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 55% (18/33) | 52% (25/48) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 0% (0/9) | 18% (2/11) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 64% (77/121) | 72% (81/112) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 28% (31/112) | 36% (44/121) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 46% (108/233) | 54% (125/233) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 4 | 6 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 6 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 86% (12/14) | 100% (16/16) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 0% (0/16) | 14% (2/14) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 40% (12/30) | 60% (18/30) |
Chances of winning
Jack Pinnington Jones
56.4% | Emilio Nava
43.6% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Jack Pinnington Jones has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+11.8%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Jack Pinnington Jones's performance.Emilio Nava has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-11.8%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Emilio Nava might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Jack Pinnington Jones than the current prediction. (-13.9%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Jack Pinnington Jones that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Emilio Nava than the current prediction. (+13.9%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Emilio Nava could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Jack Pinnington Jones - Emilio Nava Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.67 ↓
(2.07) |
|
2.14 ↑
(1.67) |
6.5%
(8.4%) | |
What is the prediction for Jack Pinnington Jones - Emilio Nava?
High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Pinnington Jones (votes: 1 - 100%).
Users Predictions:
Jack Pinnington Jones will win
(8 of 8 users predict this - 100%).
Confidence interval (95%): 100% – 100%. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Pinnington Jones is ranked ATP: 340. Nava is ranked ATP: 119.
- Pinnington Jones is undoubtedly in great shape (last 5 games: 4 wins).
- In recent matches, Nava has shown inconsistent performance (in the last 5 games, wins – 3).
- Nava may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- The probability of winning is almost the same for both players in this match.
- In the last 1 head-to-head match, Pinnington Jones won 1 match, drew 0 matches, lost 0 matches, and goals 2:0.
How many head-to-head matches has Jack Pinnington Jones won against Emilio Nava?
Jack Pinnington Jones has won 1 of their last 1 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Emilio Nava won against Jack Pinnington Jones?
Emilio Nava has won 0 of their last 1 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Jack Pinnington Jones - Emilio Nava were as follows:
06.08.2024
Emilio Nava
-
Jack Pinnington Jones
0:2
Latest results of Jack Pinnington Jones
Latest results of Emilio Nava
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | McCabe J. (Q) | Loffhagen G. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Trungelliti M. (SE) | Smith C. (LL) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Pinnington Jones J. (WC) | Nava E. | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Peniston R. (WC) | Galan D. E. (5) | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Holt B. (3) | Faria J. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Spizzirri E. (LL) | Choinski J. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 7 | Herbert P. | Mochizuki S. (SE) | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Krueger M. | Boyer T. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Cazaux A. (7) | Mannarino A. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Landaluce M. | Budkov Kjaer N. (NG) | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Atmane T. | Gigante M. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Fognini F. | Fery A. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Trotter J. K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Schoolkate T. | Blockx A. | 2 : 0 |
| 15 | Harris L. (PR) | Royer V. | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Grenier H. (Q) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | McCabe J. | Smith C. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Nava E. | Peniston R. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Faria J. | Choinski J. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Mochizuki S. | Boyer T. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Mannarino A. | Landaluce M. | 1 : 2 |
| 6 | Atmane T. | Fery A. | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Schoolkate T. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Harris L. (RET.) | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Smith C. | Nava E. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Faria J. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Landaluce M. | Atmane T. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Smith C. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Landaluce M. | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Mochizuki S. | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
