Emilio Nava vs Ryan Peniston – Schedule & Where to Watch on TV

Tennis Nottingham Challenger Men Emilio Nava - Ryan Peniston
Result
2:0
18/06/2025 at 06:30 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
  • CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Nottingham, grass - 1/8-finals

Match Stats

Aces
122
Double Faults
41
1st Serve Percentage
62%67%
1st Serve Points Won
77% (34/44)60% (28/47)
2nd Serve Points Won
52% (14/27)70% (16/23)
Break Points Saved
60% (3/5)50% (3/6)
1st Return Points Won
40% (19/47)23% (10/44)
2nd Return Points Won
30% (7/23)48% (13/27)
Break Points Converted
50% (3/6)40% (2/5)
Service Points Won
67% (47/70)63% (44/70)
Return Points Won
37% (26/70)33% (23/70)
Total Points Won
52% (73/140)48% (67/140)
Last 10 Balls
64
Match Points Saved
00
Service Games Won
82% (9/11)73% (8/11)
Return Games Won
27% (3/11)18% (2/11)
Total Games Won
55% (12/22)45% (10/22)

Chances of winning


Emilio Nava
57.6%
Ryan Peniston
42.4%

Initial Probability

(when we started the analysis)
55.8% 44.2%

Our Initial ML Estimation

59.4% 40.6%


Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:

  • Emilio Nava has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+1.8%)
  • Ryan Peniston has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-1.8%)
  • ML Model estimates a higher probability for Emilio Nava than the current prediction. (+1.8%)
  • ML Model estimates a lower probability for Ryan Peniston than the current prediction. (-1.8%)
  • Emilio Nava - Ryan Peniston Odds

    1 X 2 Marga
    Avarage Now
    (Initially)
    1.63
    (1.71)

    2.21
    (2.16)
    6.6%
    (4.8%)
    Preview Facts
    • Nava is ranked ATP: 121. Peniston is ranked ATP: 271.
    • Both players have been playing unpredictably.
    • Peniston may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
    • The chances of victory for both players are nearly identical in this match.
    • In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
    Latest results of Emilio Nava
    Latest results of Ryan Peniston
    Draw
    Singles - Main

    1/16-finals
    1McCabe J. (Q)Loffhagen G. (WC)2 : 0
    2Trungelliti M. (SE)Smith C. (LL)1 : 2
    3Pinnington Jones J. (WC)Nava E.1 : 2
    4Peniston R. (WC)Galan D. E. (5)2 : 1
    5Holt B. (3)Faria J.0 : 2
    6Spizzirri E. (LL)Choinski J. (Q)1 : 2
    7Herbert P.Mochizuki S. (SE)0 : 2
    8Krueger M.Boyer T. (8)0 : 2
    9Cazaux A. (7)Mannarino A.0 : 2
    10Landaluce M.Budkov Kjaer N. (NG)2 : 1
    11Atmane T.Gigante M. (Q)2 : 1
    12Fognini F.Fery A. (Q)0 : 2
    13Barrios Vera T. (6)Trotter J. K. (Q)2 : 0
    14Schoolkate T.Blockx A.2 : 0
    15Harris L. (PR)Royer V.2 : 0
    16Grenier H. (Q)Cilic M. (2)0 : 2

    1/8-finals
    1McCabe J.Smith C.1 : 2
    2Nava E.Peniston R.2 : 0
    3Faria J.Choinski J.2 : 0
    4Mochizuki S.Boyer T. (8)2 : 0
    5Mannarino A.Landaluce M.1 : 2
    6Atmane T.Fery A.2 : 1
    7Barrios Vera T. (6)Schoolkate T.2 : 0
    8Harris L. (RET.)Cilic M. (2)1 : 1

    Quarter-finals
    1Smith C.Nava E.2 : 1
    2Faria J.Mochizuki S.0 : 2
    3Landaluce M.Atmane T.2 : 1
    4Barrios Vera T. (6)Cilic M. (2)0 : 2

    Semi-finals
    1Smith C.Mochizuki S.0 : 2
    2Landaluce M.Cilic M. (2)1 : 2

    Final
    1Mochizuki S.Cilic M. (2)0 : 2