Result
2:0
18/05/2025 at 02:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Tbilisi - Qualification, hard - Semi-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 2 | 1 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 64% | 54% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 72% (44/61) | 80% (28/35) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 44% (15/34) | 47% (14/30) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 89% (8/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 20% (7/35) | 28% (17/61) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 53% (16/30) | 56% (19/34) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 50% (2/4) | 11% (1/9) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 62% (59/95) | 65% (42/65) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 35% (23/65) | 38% (36/95) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 51% (82/160) | 49% (78/160) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 91% (10/11) | 80% (8/10) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 20% (2/10) | 9% (1/11) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 57% (12/21) | 43% (9/21) |
Chances of winning
Giles Hussey
60.2% | Cem Ilkel
39.8% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Giles Hussey has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+4.6%)Cem Ilkel has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-4.6%)ML Model estimates a lower probability for Giles Hussey than the current prediction. (-6.3%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Giles Hussey that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Cem Ilkel than the current prediction. (+6.3%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Cem Ilkel could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Giles Hussey - Cem Ilkel Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.53 ↓
(1.67) |
|
2.32 ↑
(2.09) |
8.3%
(7.7%) | |
Preview Facts
- Hussey is ranked ATP: 453. Ilkel is ranked ATP: 526.
- Each of the players is struggling with stability in their game.
- In this match, both players are almost equally likely to win.
- The players have not played against each other recently.
How many head-to-head matches has Giles Hussey won against Cem Ilkel?
Giles Hussey has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Cem Ilkel won against Giles Hussey?
Cem Ilkel has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Giles Hussey - Cem Ilkel were as follows:
Latest results of Giles Hussey
Latest results of Cem Ilkel
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Monday J. (1) | Henning P. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Gray A. (Alt) | Pokorny L. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Chidekh C. (Q) | Karlovskiy E. (Alt) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Broom C. | Berankis R. (6) | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Coulibaly E. (3) | Jones M. (LL) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Bax F. (Alt) | Uchida K. | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Imamura M. | Snitari I. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Bar Biryukov P. | Cina F. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Sun F. (5) | Glinka D. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Andaloro F. (Q) | Searle H. | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Fomin S. (Q) | Bakshi A. (WC) | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Hussey G. (Q) | Purtseladze S. (4) | 1 : 2 |
| 13 | Strombachs R. (9) | Samrej K. (Alt) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Samuel T. | Damm M. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | Tkemaladze Z. (WC) | Loffhagen G. | 0 : 2 |
| 16 | van Wyk K. | Simakin I. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Monday J. (1) | Pokorny L. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Chidekh C. | Broom C. | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Coulibaly E. (3) | Bax F. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Snitari I. | Cina F. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Glinka D. | Searle H. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Fomin S. | Purtseladze S. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Strombachs R. (9) | Damm M. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Loffhagen G. | Simakin I. (2) | 2 : 0 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Pokorny L. | Broom C. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Coulibaly E. (3) | Cina F. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Glinka D. | Purtseladze S. (4) | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Damm M. (WO.) | Loffhagen G. | |
Semi-finals| 1 | Broom C. | Cina F. (8) | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Purtseladze S. (4) | Damm M. | 2 : 1 |
Final| 1 | Cina F. (8) | Purtseladze S. (4) | 0 : 2 |
