Result
0:2
09/06/2024 at 08:40 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Nottingham (United Kingdom) - Qualification, grass - Semi-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 5 | 4 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 5 | 1 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 65% | 80% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 69% (29/42) | 75% (43/57) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 52% (12/23) | 50% (7/14) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 26% (15/57) | 33% (14/42) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (7/14) | 48% (11/23) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 50% (1/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Max Points In Row |
|---|
| 6 | 6 |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 65% (36/55) | 68% (45/66) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 32% (21/66) | 35% (19/55) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 47% (57/121) | 53% (64/121) |
| Max Games In Row |
|---|
| 2 | 3 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 78% (7/9) | 89% (8/9) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 11% (1/9) | 22% (2/9) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 44% (8/18) | 56% (10/18) |
Chances of winning
Giles Hussey
51% | Luke Saville
49% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Giles Hussey has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+11.6%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Giles Hussey's performance.Luke Saville has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-11.6%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Luke Saville might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Giles Hussey than the current prediction. (-11.3%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Giles Hussey that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Luke Saville than the current prediction. (+11.3%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Luke Saville could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Giles Hussey - Luke Saville Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.82 ↓
(2.32) |
|
1.9 ↑
(1.51) |
7.7%
(9.3%) | |
Preview Facts
- Recent matches Hussey is playing unstable (in the last 5 games wins - 2).
- Saville is in a poor shape now (in the last 5 games wins - 1).
- The possibility to win in this match is almost balanced for both players.
- Recently, the players did not play each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Giles Hussey won against Luke Saville?
Giles Hussey has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Luke Saville won against Giles Hussey?
Luke Saville has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Giles Hussey - Luke Saville were as follows:
Latest results of Giles Hussey
Latest results of Luke Saville
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | McCabe J. (Q) | Loffhagen G. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Trungelliti M. (SE) | Smith C. (LL) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Pinnington Jones J. (WC) | Nava E. | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Peniston R. (WC) | Galan D. E. (5) | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Holt B. (3) | Faria J. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Spizzirri E. (LL) | Choinski J. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 7 | Herbert P. | Mochizuki S. (SE) | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Krueger M. | Boyer T. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Cazaux A. (7) | Mannarino A. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Landaluce M. | Budkov Kjaer N. (NG) | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Atmane T. | Gigante M. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Fognini F. | Fery A. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Trotter J. K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Schoolkate T. | Blockx A. | 2 : 0 |
| 15 | Harris L. (PR) | Royer V. | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Grenier H. (Q) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | McCabe J. | Smith C. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Nava E. | Peniston R. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Faria J. | Choinski J. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Mochizuki S. | Boyer T. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Mannarino A. | Landaluce M. | 1 : 2 |
| 6 | Atmane T. | Fery A. | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Schoolkate T. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Harris L. (RET.) | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Smith C. | Nava E. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Faria J. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Landaluce M. | Atmane T. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Smith C. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Landaluce M. | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Mochizuki S. | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
