| Zhuhai Qinao 41.7% | Draw 31.1% | Kunming City 27.1% |
| 38.8% | 33.5% | 27.7% |
| 1 | X | 2 | Marga | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avarage Now (Initially) |
2.15 ↓ (2.3) |
2.89 ↑ (2.66) |
3.31 ↑ (3.23) |
11.2% (12%) |
| Pl | W | D | L | Diff | Pts | |||
| 1 | Taian Tiankuang | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:3 | 4 | 9 |
| 2 | Shanghai Port B | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8:2 | 6 | 7 |
| 3 | Shandong Taishan B | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 2 | 6 |
| 4 | Dalian Yingbo B | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4:3 | 1 | 5 |
| 5 | Lanzhou Longyuan | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2:1 | 1 | 5 |
| 6 | Dalian Kewei | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1:0 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | Nantong Haimen | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5:2 | 3 | 4 |
| 8 | Qingdao Red Lions | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:4 | -1 | 2 |
| 9 | Changchun Xidu | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1:5 | -4 | 2 |
| 10 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1:3 | -2 | 1 |
| 11 | Shanghai Second | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5:11 | -6 | 1 |
| 12 | Beijing Technology | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | -5 | 0 |
| Pl | W | D | L | Diff | Pts | |||
| 1 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:2 | 2 | 6 |
| 2 | Guizhou Guiyang | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3:3 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | Chengdu Rongcheng B | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 1 | 6 |
| 4 | Xiamen Feilu | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7:5 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | Hubei Istar | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4:4 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 | Hangzhou Linping | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3:3 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | Wuhan Three Towns B | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3:3 | 0 | 3 |
| 8 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2:2 | 0 | 3 |
| 9 | Jiangxi Lushan | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4:5 | -1 | 2 |
| 10 | Guangdong Mingtu | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3:4 | -1 | 2 |
| 11 | Wenzhou Professional | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:3 | -1 | 2 |
| 12 | Shenzhen | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2:4 | -2 | 2 |