Result
1:2
25/07/2025 at 11:30 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER WOMEN - SINGLES: Palermo, clay - Quarter-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 4 | 4 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 5 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 67% | 66% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 62% (34/55) | 68% (52/77) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 41% (11/27) | 51% (20/39) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 25% (2/8) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 32% (25/77) | 38% (21/55) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 49% (19/39) | 59% (16/27) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 31% (4/13) | 75% (6/8) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 55% (45/82) | 62% (72/116) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 38% (44/116) | 45% (37/82) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 45% (89/198) | 55% (109/198) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 4 | 6 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 2 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 60% (9/15) | 75% (12/16) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 25% (4/16) | 40% (6/15) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 42% (13/31) | 58% (18/31) |
Chances of winning
Hanne Van De Winkel
38.4% | Tatiana Prozorova
61.6% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Hanne Van De Winkel has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-2.4%)Tatiana Prozorova has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+2.4%)ML Model estimates a higher probability for Hanne Van De Winkel than the current prediction. (+0.3%)ML Model estimates a lower probability for Tatiana Prozorova than the current prediction. (-0.3%)
Hanne Van De Winkel - Tatiana Prozorova Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
2.44 ↑
(2.29) |
|
1.53 ↓
(1.58) |
6.4%
(7%) | |
Preview Facts
- Van De Winkel is ranked WTA: 175. Prozorova is ranked WTA: 157.
- Both players have been playing unpredictably.
- Van De Winkel may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- Prozorova is expected to have a slight advantage in this match.
- In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
How many head-to-head matches has Hanne Van De Winkel won against Tatiana Prozorova?
Hanne Van De Winkel has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Tatiana Prozorova won against Hanne Van De Winkel?
Tatiana Prozorova has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Hanne Van De Winkel - Tatiana Prozorova were as follows:
Latest results of Hanne Van De Winkel
Latest results of Tatiana Prozorova
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Sherif M. (1) | Fita Boluda A. (LL) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Vandewinkel H. | Spiteri D. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Deichmann K. | Riera J. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Prozorova T. | Jimenez Kasintseva V. (6) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Jones F. (3) | Paquet C. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Selekhmeteva O. | Pedone G. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Jamrichova R. (Q) | Zantedeschi A. (LL) | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Udvardy P. | Erjavec V. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 9 | Waltert S. (5) | Bulgaru M. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Quevedo K. (Q) | Radivojevic L. | 2 : 1 |
| 11 | Koevermans A. | Rame A. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Niemeier J. | Semenistaja D. (4) | 1 : 2 |
| 13 | Romero Gormaz L. (7) | Ambrosio S. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 14 | Grant T. C. (WC) | Zidansek T. (SE) | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Liu C. | Martinez Cirez C. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 16 | Wuerth T. | Grabher J. (9) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Sherif M. (1) | Vandewinkel H. (WO.) | |
| 2 | Deichmann K. | Prozorova T. | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Jones F. (3) | Selekhmeteva O. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Jamrichova R. | Udvardy P. | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Bulgaru M. | Quevedo K. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Koevermans A. | Semenistaja D. (4) | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Ambrosio S. | Zidansek T. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Martinez Cirez C. (RET.) | Grabher J. (9) | 0 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Vandewinkel H. | Prozorova T. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Jones F. (3) | Udvardy P. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Quevedo K. | Koevermans A. | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Zidansek T. | Grabher J. (9) | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Prozorova T. | Jones F. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Koevermans A. | Grabher J. (9) | 2 : 1 |
Final| 1 | Jones F. (3) | Koevermans A. | 2 : 0 |
