Result
2:1
09/06/2024 at 10:10 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Nottingham (United Kingdom) - Qualification, grass - Semi-finals
Match Stats
| |
---|
Aces |
---|
9 | 0 |
Double Faults |
---|
6 | 10 |
1st Serve Percentage |
---|
74% | 68% |
1st Serve Points Won |
---|
67% (47/70) | 66% (45/68) |
2nd Serve Points Won |
---|
54% (13/24) | 47% (15/32) |
Break Points Saved |
---|
33% (2/6) | 75% (9/12) |
1st Return Points Won |
---|
35% (24/68) | 36% (25/70) |
2nd Return Points Won |
---|
53% (17/32) | 46% (11/24) |
Break Points Converted |
---|
25% (3/12) | 67% (4/6) |
Max Points In Row |
---|
7 | 9 |
Service Points Won |
---|
62% (58/94) | 60% (59/99) |
Return Points Won |
---|
40% (40/99) | 38% (36/94) |
Total Points Won |
---|
51% (98/193) | 49% (95/193) |
Max Games In Row |
---|
3 | 4 |
Service Games Won |
---|
73% (11/15) | 79% (11/14) |
Return Games Won |
---|
21% (3/14) | 27% (4/15) |
Total Games Won |
---|
48% (14/29) | 52% (15/29) |
Chances of winning
Jacob Fearnley 50.9% | Clement Chidekh 49.1% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Jacob Fearnley has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+7.7%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Jacob Fearnley's performance.Clement Chidekh has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-7.7%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Clement Chidekh might be facing challenges that affect their performance.
Jacob Fearnley - Clement Chidekh Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now (Initially) |
1.83 ↓ (2.13) |
|
1.9 ↑ (1.62) |
7.3% (8.7%) | |
What is the prediction for Jacob Fearnley - Clement Chidekh?
Users Predictions:
5 users predict this event. Fearnley will win (votes: 2 - 40%). Chidekh will win (votes: 3 - 60%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- Recent matches Chidekh is playing uncertain (in the last 5 games wins - 2).
- Fearnley could have advantage in physics - more days for rest in last days.
- The possibility to win in this match is almost balanced for both players.
- Recently, the players did not play each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Jacob Fearnley won against Clement Chidekh?
Jacob Fearnley has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Clement Chidekh won against Jacob Fearnley?
Clement Chidekh has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Jacob Fearnley - Clement Chidekh were as follows:
Latest results of Jacob Fearnley
Latest results of Clement Chidekh
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals1 | McCabe J. (Q) | Loffhagen G. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
2 | Trungelliti M. (SE) | Smith C. (LL) | 1 : 2 |
3 | Pinnington Jones J. (WC) | Nava E. | 1 : 2 |
4 | Peniston R. (WC) | Galan D. E. (5) | 2 : 1 |
5 | Holt B. (3) | Faria J. | 0 : 2 |
6 | Spizzirri E. (LL) | Choinski J. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
7 | Herbert P. | Mochizuki S. (SE) | 0 : 2 |
8 | Krueger M. | Boyer T. (8) | 0 : 2 |
9 | Cazaux A. (7) | Mannarino A. | 0 : 2 |
10 | Landaluce M. | Budkov Kjaer N. (NG) | 2 : 1 |
11 | Atmane T. | Gigante M. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
12 | Fognini F. | Fery A. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
13 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Trotter J. K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
14 | Schoolkate T. | Blockx A. | 2 : 0 |
15 | Harris L. (PR) | Royer V. | 2 : 0 |
16 | Grenier H. (Q) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals1 | McCabe J. | Smith C. | 1 : 2 |
2 | Nava E. | Peniston R. | 2 : 0 |
3 | Faria J. | Choinski J. | 2 : 0 |
4 | Mochizuki S. | Boyer T. (8) | 2 : 0 |
5 | Mannarino A. | Landaluce M. | 1 : 2 |
6 | Atmane T. | Fery A. | 2 : 1 |
7 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Schoolkate T. | 2 : 0 |
8 | Harris L. (RET.) | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 1 |
Quarter-finals1 | Smith C. | Nava E. | 2 : 1 |
2 | Faria J. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
3 | Landaluce M. | Atmane T. | 2 : 1 |
4 | Barrios Vera T. (6) | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals1 | Smith C. | Mochizuki S. | 0 : 2 |
2 | Landaluce M. | Cilic M. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Final1 | Mochizuki S. | Cilic M. (2) | 0 : 2 |