Result
2:1
19/09/2025 at 11:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Columbus, hard - Quarter-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 9 | 15 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 9 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 54% | 64% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 78% (43/55) | 80% (48/60) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 55% (26/47) | 53% (18/34) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 60% (3/5) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 22% (13/60) | 22% (12/55) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 47% (16/34) | 45% (21/47) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 38% (3/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 68% (69/102) | 69% (65/94) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 31% (29/94) | 32% (33/102) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (98/196) | 50% (98/196) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 7 | 3 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 88% (15/17) | 82% (14/17) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 18% (3/17) | 12% (2/17) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 53% (18/34) | 47% (16/34) |
Chances of winning
Martin Damm
55.2% | James Kent Trotter
44.8% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Martin Damm has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+5.2%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Martin Damm's performance.James Kent Trotter has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-5.2%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and James Kent Trotter might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Martin Damm than the current prediction. (-6.9%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Martin Damm that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for James Kent Trotter than the current prediction. (+6.9%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that James Kent Trotter could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Martin Damm - James Kent Trotter Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.7 ↓
(1.85) |
|
2.08 ↑
(1.85) |
6.9%
(8%) | |
What is the prediction for Martin Damm - James Kent Trotter?
High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 2 high ROI users predict this event. Damm (votes: 2 - 100%).
Users Predictions:
Martin Damm will win
(6 of 7 users predict this - 85.71%).
Confidence interval (95%): 59.78% – 100%. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Damm is ranked ATP: 277. Trotter is ranked ATP: 187.
- Damm has been quite unpredictable recently (last 5 games: 3 wins).
- Trotter is showing top-class performance now (in the last 5 games, wins – 4).
- Damm may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- The chances of victory for both players are nearly identical in this match.
- In the last 2 head-to-head matches, Damm won 0 matches, drew 0 matches, lost 2 matches, and goals 0:4. (average 0:2).
How many head-to-head matches has Martin Damm won against James Kent Trotter?
Martin Damm has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has James Kent Trotter won against Martin Damm?
James Kent Trotter has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Martin Damm - James Kent Trotter were as follows:
Latest results of Martin Damm
Latest results of James Kent Trotter
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Ficovich J. P. (RET.) (1) | Perez A. | 0 : 0 |
| 2 | Papamalamis T. (JR) | Boulais J. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Ilagan A. | Dominko S. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Zheng M. | Johns G. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Mejia N. (4) | Jodar R. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Rybakov A. | Bouzige M. | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Stearns P. (Q) | Masur D. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Bondioli F. | Martin A. (6) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Damm M. (7) | Kim A. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Anthrop J. (WC) | Ghibaudo A. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Brunclik P. (Alt) | Maloney P. | 0 : 2 |
| 12 | Sekulic P. (PR) | Trotter J. K. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Monday J. (5) | Blanch Dar. | 1 : 2 |
| 14 | Langmo C. | Banerjee S. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Zink T. | Bernard A. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Shelbayh A. | Cassone M. (2) | 2 : 0 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Perez A. | Boulais J. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Ilagan A. | Zheng M. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Jodar R. | Rybakov A. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Masur D. | Martin A. (6) | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Damm M. (7) | Ghibaudo A. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Maloney P. | Trotter J. K. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Blanch Dar. | Banerjee S. | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Zink T. | Shelbayh A. | 2 : 0 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Perez A. | Zheng M. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Jodar R. | Masur D. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Damm M. (7) | Trotter J. K. (3) | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Banerjee S. | Zink T. | 2 : 0 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Zheng M. | Masur D. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Damm M. (7) | Banerjee S. | 2 : 0 |
Final| 1 | Zheng M. | Damm M. (7) | 2 : 1 |
