Result
0:2
30/03/2026 at 13:10 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- ATP - SINGLES: Marrakech, clay - 1/16-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 11 | 7 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 3 | 1 |
| 1st serve percentage |
|---|
| 74% | 69% |
| 1st serve points won |
|---|
| 69% (45/65) | 91% (39/43) |
| 2nd serve points won |
|---|
| 35% (8/23) | 53% (10/19) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 6/8 | 1/2 |
| 1st return points won |
|---|
| 9% (4/43) | 32% (21/65) |
| 2nd return points won |
|---|
| 47% (9/19) | 65% (15/23) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 1/2 | 2/8 |
| Winners |
|---|
| 23 | 33 |
| Unforced errors |
|---|
| 20 | 25 |
| Net points won |
|---|
| 70% (7/10) | 86% (6/7) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 62% (53/86) | 79% (49/62) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 21% (13/62) | 38% (33/86) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 45% (66/148) | 55% (82/148) |
| Last 10 balls |
|---|
| 4 | 6 |
| Match points saved |
|---|
| 3 | 0 |
| Service games won |
|---|
| 82% (9/11) | 91% (10/11) |
| Return games won |
|---|
| 9% (1/11) | 18% (2/11) |
| Total games won |
|---|
| 45% (10/22) | 55% (12/22) |
Chances of winning
Jesper De Jong
37.8% | Yannick Hanfmann
62.2% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Jesper De Jong has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+7%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Jesper De Jong's performance.Yannick Hanfmann has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-7%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Yannick Hanfmann might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Jesper De Jong than the current prediction. (-7.4%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Jesper De Jong that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Yannick Hanfmann than the current prediction. (+7.4%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Yannick Hanfmann could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Jesper De Jong - Yannick Hanfmann Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
2.49 ↓
(3.04) |
|
1.53 ↑
(1.35) |
5.4%
(7%) | |
What is the prediction for Jesper De Jong - Yannick Hanfmann?
Users Predictions:
15 users predict this event. De Jong will win (votes: 8 - 53.3%). Hanfmann will win (votes: 7 - 46.7%).
Confidence interval (95%) for De Jong: 28.1% – 78.5%.Verified Performance Core (Selected Experts): 1 Selected Experts predict this event. De Jong (votes: 1 - 100%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- De Jong is ranked ATP: 91. Hanfmann is ranked ATP: 64.
- De Jong is currently in amazing form (last 5 games: 4 wins).
- Hanfmann has been unpredictable lately (in the last 5 games, wins – 3).
- Hanfmann may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- Hanfmann might have a minor edge in this game.
- In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
How many head-to-head matches has Jesper De Jong won against Yannick Hanfmann?
Jesper De Jong has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Yannick Hanfmann won against Jesper De Jong?
Yannick Hanfmann has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Jesper De Jong - Yannick Hanfmann were as follows:
Latest results of Jesper De Jong
Latest results of Yannick Hanfmann
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Darderi L. (1) | Bye | |
| 2 | Bellucci M. | Bennani R. (WC) | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Bennani K. (WC) | Halys Q. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | De Jong J. | Hanfmann Y. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Moutet C. (3) | Bye | |
| 6 | Vukic A. | Baadi T. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 7 | Rocha H. (Q) | Trungelliti M. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Cerundolo J. M. | Majchrzak K. (5) | 1 : 2 |
| 9 | Kopriva V. (6) | Medjedovic H. | 2 : 1 |
| 10 | Cina F. (NG) | Muller A. | 0 : 2 |
| 11 | Jodar R. | Lajovic D. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 12 | Bye | Machac T. (4) | |
| 13 | Buse I. (7) | Berrettini M. | 2 : 1 |
| 14 | Skatov T. (Q) | Ugo Carabelli C. | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | van Assche L. | Gaston H. | 2 : 0 |
| 16 | Bye | Griekspoor T. (2) | |
1/8-finals| 1 | Darderi L. (1) | Bellucci M. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Bennani K. | Hanfmann Y. (8) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Moutet C. (3) | Baadi T. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Trungelliti M. | Majchrzak K. (5) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Kopriva V. (6) | Muller A. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Jodar R. | Machac T. (4) | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Buse I. (7) | Ugo Carabelli C. | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | van Assche L. | Griekspoor T. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Darderi L. (WO.) (1) | Hanfmann Y. (8) | |
| 2 | Moutet C. (3) | Trungelliti M. | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Muller A. (RET.) | Jodar R. | 0 : 1 |
| 4 | Ugo Carabelli C. | van Assche L. | 2 : 1 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Darderi L. (1) | Trungelliti M. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Jodar R. | Ugo Carabelli C. | 2 : 0 |
Final| 1 | Trungelliti M. | Jodar R. | 0 : 2 |
