Result
0:2
11/09/2025 at 04:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER WOMEN - SINGLES: San Sebastian, clay - 1/8-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 3 | 2 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 7 | 3 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 69% | 70% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (17/34) | 82% (27/33) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 47% (7/15) | 57% (8/14) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 43% (3/7) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 15% (5/33) | 53% (18/34) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 43% (6/14) | 53% (8/15) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 33% (1/3) | 57% (4/7) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 49% (24/49) | 76% (35/46) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 24% (11/46) | 51% (25/49) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 37% (35/95) | 63% (60/95) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 50% (4/8) | 89% (8/9) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 11% (1/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 29% (5/17) | 71% (12/17) |
Chances of winning
Julia Grabher
62.7% | Carson Branstine
37.3% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Julia Grabher has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+5.5%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Julia Grabher's performance.Carson Branstine has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-5.5%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Carson Branstine might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Julia Grabher than the current prediction. (-7.4%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Julia Grabher that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Carson Branstine than the current prediction. (+7.4%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Carson Branstine could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Julia Grabher - Carson Branstine Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.5 ↓
(1.61) |
|
2.48 ↑
(2.15) |
6.8%
(8.6%) | |
What is the prediction for Julia Grabher - Carson Branstine?
High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 1 high ROI users predict this event. Grabher (votes: 1 - 100%).
Users Predictions:
Julia Grabher will win
(9 of 11 users predict this - 81.82%).
Confidence interval (95%): 59.03% – 100%. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Grabher is ranked WTA: 117. Branstine is ranked WTA: 192.
- Grabher has had mixed results lately (last 5 games: 3 wins).
- Branstine is currently in excellent shape (in the last 5 games, wins – 4).
- Branstine may face physical challenges compared to their opponent, as they have played more matches in recent days.
- Grabher is expected to have a slight advantage in this match.
- Recently, there has been no match between the players.
How many head-to-head matches has Julia Grabher won against Carson Branstine?
Julia Grabher has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Carson Branstine won against Julia Grabher?
Carson Branstine has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Julia Grabher - Carson Branstine were as follows:
Latest results of Julia Grabher
Latest results of Carson Branstine
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Sherif M. (1) | Berecoechea N. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Korpatsch T. (Q) | Cornet A. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Bolsova Zadoinov A. | Kalieva E. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Vedder E. | Rus A. (7) | 1 : 2 |
| 5 | Todoni A. A. (3) | Spiteri D. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 6 | Werner C. | Radivojevic L. | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Selekhmeteva O. | Wuerth T. | 2 : 1 |
| 8 | Mintegi Del Olmo A. (WC) | Deichmann K. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 9 | Grabher J. (5) | Cortez Llorca L. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Bassols M. (WC) | Branstine C. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Naef C. | Burillo Escorihuela I. | 1 : 2 |
| 12 | Maristany G. | Semenistaja D. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Romero Gormaz L. (6) | Esquiva Banuls C. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Fita Boluda A. | Martinez Cirez C. | 2 : 1 |
| 15 | Koevermans A. | Smith T. N. (LL) | 2 : 1 |
| 16 | Schunk N. | Bejlek S. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Sherif M. (1) | Korpatsch T. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Bolsova Zadoinov A. | Rus A. (7) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Todoni A. A. (3) | Radivojevic L. (WO.) | |
| 4 | Selekhmeteva O. | Mintegi Del Olmo A. | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Grabher J. (5) | Branstine C. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Burillo Escorihuela I. | Semenistaja D. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Romero Gormaz L. (6) | Fita Boluda A. | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Koevermans A. | Bejlek S. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Korpatsch T. | Rus A. (7) | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Radivojevic L. | Selekhmeteva O. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Branstine C. | Semenistaja D. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Fita Boluda A. | Koevermans A. | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Korpatsch T. | Selekhmeteva O. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Semenistaja D. (4) | Koevermans A. | 0 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Selekhmeteva O. | Koevermans A. | 2 : 0 |
