Result
2:0
28/10/2024 at 14:55 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Charlottesville (USA) - Qualification, hard (indoor) - Final
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 3 | 5 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 1 | 1 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 61% | 63% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 92% (23/25) | 60% (30/50) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 81% (13/16) | 45% (13/29) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 40% (20/50) | 8% (2/25) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 55% (16/29) | 19% (3/16) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 88% (36/41) | 54% (43/79) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 46% (36/79) | 12% (5/41) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 60% (72/120) | 40% (48/120) |
| Last 10 Balls |
|---|
| 8 | 2 |
| Match Points Saved |
|---|
| 0 | 2 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 100% (9/9) | 67% (6/9) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/9) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 67% (12/18) | 33% (6/18) |
Chances of winning
Kyle Edmund
74.9% | Strong Kirchheimer
25.1% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Kyle Edmund has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+10.5%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Kyle Edmund's performance.Strong Kirchheimer has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-10.5%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Strong Kirchheimer might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Kyle Edmund than the current prediction. (-6.5%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Kyle Edmund that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Strong Kirchheimer than the current prediction. (+6.5%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Strong Kirchheimer could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Kyle Edmund - Strong Kirchheimer Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.25 ↓
(1.44) |
|
3.72 ↑
(2.6) |
7.2%
(7.9%) | |
What is the prediction for Kyle Edmund - Strong Kirchheimer?
Users Predictions:
8 users predict this event. Edmund will win (votes: 6 - 75%). Kirchheimer will win (votes: 2 - 25%).
Confidence interval (95%) for Edmund: 45% – 100%. The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Edmund is ranked ATP: 334. Kirchheimer is ranked ATP: 614.
- The game of competitors is shaky now.
- Edmund could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
- Edmund will have a small advantage in this match.
- Recently, the players did not play each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Kyle Edmund won against Strong Kirchheimer?
Kyle Edmund has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Strong Kirchheimer won against Kyle Edmund?
Strong Kirchheimer has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Kyle Edmund - Strong Kirchheimer were as follows:
Latest results of Kyle Edmund
Latest results of Strong Kirchheimer
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Eubanks C. (1) | Zahraj P. (Q) | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Basavareddy N. | Spizzirri E. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Rodesch C. (LL) | Nanda G. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Kodat T. (Q) | Jubb P. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Svajda Z. (4) | Dietrich D. (WC) | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Nakagawa N. (Q) | Galarneau A. | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Couacaud E. | Quinn E. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Edmund K. (Q) | Kasnikowski M. (5) | 1 : 2 |
| 9 | Popko D. (7) | Opelka R. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 10 | Ilagan A. (Q) | Smith C. (SE) | 0 : 2 |
| 11 | Rybakov A. (Q) | Holt B. | 0 : 2 |
| 12 | Trotter J. K. | Krueger M. (3) | 2 : 0 |
| 13 | Kypson P. (6) | Tomic B. | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Searle H. | Lajal M. | 0 : 2 |
| 15 | Mejia N. | Kudla D. | 2 : 1 |
| 16 | Zhukayev B. | Tien L. (2) | 1 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Zahraj P. | Basavareddy N. | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Rodesch C. | Jubb P. (8) | 2 : 1 |
| 3 | Dietrich D. | Galarneau A. | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Quinn E. | Kasnikowski M. (5) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Opelka R. | Smith C. | 1 : 2 |
| 6 | Holt B. | Trotter J. K. | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Kypson P. (6) | Lajal M. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Mejia N. | Tien L. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Basavareddy N. | Rodesch C. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Galarneau A. | Quinn E. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Smith C. | Trotter J. K. | 1 : 2 |
| 4 | Lajal M. | Tien L. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Basavareddy N. | Galarneau A. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Trotter J. K. | Tien L. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Final| 1 | Basavareddy N. | Trotter J. K. | 0 : 2 |
