Result
2:0
01/08/2024 at 12:30 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Lexington (USA), hard - 1/8-finals
- Referee: Pennington R. (Usa)
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 5 | 0 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 5 | 2 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 75% | 63% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 82% (32/39) | 62% (23/37) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 54% (7/13) | 59% (13/22) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 67% (2/3) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 41% (15/37) | 18% (7/39) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 41% (9/22) | 46% (6/13) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 38% (3/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| Max Points In Row |
|---|
| 12 | 7 |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 75% (39/52) | 60% (34/57) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 40% (23/57) | 25% (13/52) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 57% (62/109) | 43% (47/109) |
| Max Games In Row |
|---|
| 3 | 3 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 90% (9/10) | 70% (7/10) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 30% (3/10) | 10% (1/10) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 60% (12/20) | 40% (8/20) |
Chances of winning
Li Tu
46.4% | James Kent Trotter
53.6% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Li Tu has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-7.2%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Li Tu's form might have worsened.James Kent Trotter has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+7.2%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting James Kent Trotter's recent form is better than expected.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Li Tu than the current prediction. (+8.2%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests a strong performance forecast for Li Tu, possibly due to key factors that the model accounted for.ML Model estimates a lower probability for James Kent Trotter than the current prediction. (-8.2%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests a potential downturn for James Kent Trotter, possibly due to injuries or other negative factors.
Li Tu - James Kent Trotter Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
2.03 ↑
(1.73) |
|
1.74 ↓
(2) |
6.7%
(8%) | |
What is the prediction for Li Tu - James Kent Trotter?
Users Predictions:
6 users predict this event. Tu will win (votes: 2 - 33.3%). Trotter will win (votes: 4 - 66.7%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- Tu is ranked ATP: 222. Trotter is ranked ATP: 322.
- Recent matches Tu is playing mutable (in the last 5 games wins - 3).
- Trotter is in super good shape now (in the last 5 games wins - 4).
- Trotter could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
- The possibility to win in this match is almost balanced for both players.
- Recently, the players did not play each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Li Tu won against James Kent Trotter?
Li Tu has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has James Kent Trotter won against Li Tu?
James Kent Trotter has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Li Tu - James Kent Trotter were as follows:
Latest results of James Kent Trotter
Draw
Singles - QualificationSemi-finals| 1 | Wu Tung-Lin (1) | Kiger M. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Mayo K. (WC) | Matsuda R. (11) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Mayo A. (2) | Kirchheimer S. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Hilderbrand T. (Alt) | Damm M. (9) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Rybakov A. (3) | Stephenson E. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Svajda T. | Huang T. (12) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Maloney P. (4) | Fenty A. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Weekes J. (Alt) | Dostanic S. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Nakagawa N. (RET.) (5) | Suresh D. (CO) | 0 : 1 |
| 10 | Rankin M. (WC) | Ilagan A. (7) | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Johns G. (6) | Ramanathan R. | 2 : 0 |
| 12 | Kumar P. (Alt) | Hussey G. (10) | 0 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Wu Tung-Lin (1) | Matsuda R. (11) | |
| 2 | Mayo A. (2) | Damm M. (9) | |
| 3 | Rybakov A. (3) | Svajda T. | |
| 4 | Maloney P. (4) | Dostanic S. (8) | |
| 5 | Suresh D. | Ilagan A. (7) | |
| 6 | Johns G. (6) | Hussey G. (10) | |
