Mark Lajal vs Patrick Brady – Schedule & Where to Watch on TV

Tennis Nottingham Challenger Men Mark Lajal - Patrick Brady
Result
2:1
09/06/2024 at 09:45 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
  • CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Nottingham (United Kingdom) - Qualification, grass - Semi-finals

Match Stats

Aces
20
Double Faults
32
1st Serve Percentage
73%75%
1st Serve Points Won
72% (39/54)53% (42/79)
2nd Serve Points Won
50% (10/20)48% (13/27)
Break Points Saved
71% (5/7)75% (15/20)
1st Return Points Won
48% (38/79)28% (15/54)
2nd Return Points Won
52% (14/27)50% (10/20)
Break Points Converted
25% (5/20)29% (2/7)
Max Points In Row
94
Service Points Won
66% (48/73)52% (55/105)
Return Points Won
48% (50/105)34% (25/73)
Total Points Won
55% (98/178)45% (80/178)
Max Games In Row
63
Service Games Won
83% (10/12)58% (7/12)
Return Games Won
42% (5/12)17% (2/12)
Total Games Won
63% (15/24)38% (9/24)

Chances of winning


Mark Lajal
74.3%
Patrick Brady
25.7%

Initial Probability

(when we started the analysis)
62.7% 37.3%


Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:

  • Mark Lajal has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+11.6%)
  • Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Mark Lajal's performance.
  • Patrick Brady has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-11.6%)
  • Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Patrick Brady might be facing challenges that affect their performance.
  • Mark Lajal - Patrick Brady Odds

    1 X 2 Marga
    Avarage Now
    (Initially)
    1.26
    (1.45)

    3.63
    (2.44)
    7.1%
    (9.9%)
    Preview Facts
    • Lajal is in poor shape (in the last 5 games wins - 1).
    • Lajal could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
    • In this match Lajal is a favorite.
    • Recently, the players did not play each other.
    Latest results of Mark Lajal
    Latest results of Patrick Brady
    Draw
    Singles - Main

    1/16-finals
    1McCabe J. (Q)Loffhagen G. (WC)2 : 0
    2Trungelliti M. (SE)Smith C. (LL)1 : 2
    3Pinnington Jones J. (WC)Nava E.1 : 2
    4Peniston R. (WC)Galan D. E. (5)2 : 1
    5Holt B. (3)Faria J.0 : 2
    6Spizzirri E. (LL)Choinski J. (Q)1 : 2
    7Herbert P.Mochizuki S. (SE)0 : 2
    8Krueger M.Boyer T. (8)0 : 2
    9Cazaux A. (7)Mannarino A.0 : 2
    10Landaluce M.Budkov Kjaer N. (NG)2 : 1
    11Atmane T.Gigante M. (Q)2 : 1
    12Fognini F.Fery A. (Q)0 : 2
    13Barrios Vera T. (6)Trotter J. K. (Q)2 : 0
    14Schoolkate T.Blockx A.2 : 0
    15Harris L. (PR)Royer V.2 : 0
    16Grenier H. (Q)Cilic M. (2)0 : 2

    1/8-finals
    1McCabe J.Smith C.1 : 2
    2Nava E.Peniston R.2 : 0
    3Faria J.Choinski J.2 : 0
    4Mochizuki S.Boyer T. (8)2 : 0
    5Mannarino A.Landaluce M.1 : 2
    6Atmane T.Fery A.2 : 1
    7Barrios Vera T. (6)Schoolkate T.2 : 0
    8Harris L. (RET.)Cilic M. (2)1 : 1

    Quarter-finals
    1Smith C.Nava E.2 : 1
    2Faria J.Mochizuki S.0 : 2
    3Landaluce M.Atmane T.2 : 1
    4Barrios Vera T. (6)Cilic M. (2)0 : 2

    Semi-finals
    1Smith C.Mochizuki S.0 : 2
    2Landaluce M.Cilic M. (2)1 : 2

    Final
    1Mochizuki S.Cilic M. (2)0 : 2