Result
2:0
24/07/2024 at 16:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Chicago (USA), hard - 1/8-finals
- Referee: Meister R. (Usa)
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 7 | 6 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 2 | 6 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 72% | 42% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 83% (30/36) | 68% (17/25) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 36% (5/14) | 44% (15/34) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 67% (2/3) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 32% (8/25) | 17% (6/36) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 56% (19/34) | 64% (9/14) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 40% (4/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Max Points In Row |
|---|
| 6 | 5 |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 70% (35/50) | 54% (32/59) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 46% (27/59) | 30% (15/50) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 57% (62/109) | 43% (47/109) |
| Max Games In Row |
|---|
| 5 | 2 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 89% (8/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 44% (4/9) | 11% (1/9) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 67% (12/18) | 33% (6/18) |
Chances of winning
Mitchell Krueger
56.1% | Philip Sekulic
43.9% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Mitchell Krueger has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-6.1%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Mitchell Krueger's form might have worsened.Philip Sekulic has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+6.1%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting Philip Sekulic's recent form is better than expected.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Mitchell Krueger than the current prediction. (+6.8%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests a strong performance forecast for Mitchell Krueger, possibly due to key factors that the model accounted for.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Philip Sekulic than the current prediction. (-6.8%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests a potential downturn for Philip Sekulic, possibly due to injuries or other negative factors.
Mitchell Krueger - Philip Sekulic Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.67 ↑
(1.5) |
|
2.13 ↓
(2.47) |
6.8%
(7.2%) | |
Preview Facts
- One and the other player get a very uncertain game.
- Sekulic could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
- In this match the chances to achieve triumph for both players are almost equal.
- Recently, the players did not play each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Mitchell Krueger won against Philip Sekulic?
Mitchell Krueger has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Philip Sekulic won against Mitchell Krueger?
Philip Sekulic has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Mitchell Krueger - Philip Sekulic were as follows:
Latest results of Mitchell Krueger
Latest results of Philip Sekulic
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Atmane T. (1) | Braswell M. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Fearnley J. (Q) | Tu L. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Holt B. (Alt) | Fenty A. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Polmans M. | Galarneau A. (5) | 2 : 1 |
| 5 | Diallo G. (4) | Trotter J. K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Fonseca J. | Shimizu Y. | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Krueger M. | Gea A. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Sekulic P. | Wong C. (7) | 2 : 0 |
| 9 | Bu Y. (6) | Zheng M. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Wu Tung-Lin (Q) | Jubb P. | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Basavareddy N. (WC) | Lajal M. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 12 | Tomic B. | Grenier H. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Hong S. C. (8) | Bolt A. | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Shimabukuro S. | Broom C. | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | Ficovich J. P. | Mayo A. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
| 16 | Tien L. (WC) | Bonzi B. (2) | 2 : 0 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Atmane T. (1) | Fearnley J. | 1 : 2 |
| 2 | Holt B. | Polmans M. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Diallo G. (4) | Fonseca J. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Krueger M. | Sekulic P. | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Bu Y. (6) | Jubb P. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Basavareddy N. | Grenier H. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Hong S. C. (8) | Broom C. | 2 : 1 |
| 8 | Mayo A. | Tien L. | 1 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Fearnley J. | Holt B. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Diallo G. (4) | Krueger M. | 2 : 0 |
| 3 | Bu Y. (6) | Grenier H. (3) | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Hong S. C. (8) | Tien L. | 0 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Fearnley J. | Diallo G. (4) | 0 : 2 |
| 2 | Bu Y. (6) | Tien L. | 2 : 0 |
Final| 1 | Diallo G. (4) | Bu Y. (6) | 2 : 0 |
