Result
2:0
29/07/2024 at 09:00 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Lexington (USA) - Qualification, hard - Semi-finals
- Referee: Meister R. (Usa)
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 7 | 6 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 4 | 4 |
| 1st Serve Percentage |
|---|
| 63% | 39% |
| 1st Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 86% (31/36) | 67% (18/27) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won |
|---|
| 48% (10/21) | 55% (23/42) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 100% (3/3) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st Return Points Won |
|---|
| 37% (10/27) | 17% (6/36) |
| 2nd Return Points Won |
|---|
| 45% (19/42) | 52% (11/21) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/3) |
| Max Points In Row |
|---|
| 6 | 4 |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 72% (41/57) | 59% (41/69) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 41% (28/69) | 28% (16/57) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 55% (69/126) | 45% (57/126) |
| Max Games In Row |
|---|
| 3 | 1 |
| Service Games Won |
|---|
| 100% (8/8) | 100% (7/7) |
| Return Games Won |
|---|
| 0% (0/7) | 0% (0/8) |
| Total Games Won |
|---|
| 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
Chances of winning
Ryan Seggerman
55.9% | Quinn Vandecasteele
44.1% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Ryan Seggerman has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-8.7%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Ryan Seggerman's form might have worsened.Quinn Vandecasteele has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+8.7%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting Quinn Vandecasteele's recent form is better than expected.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Ryan Seggerman than the current prediction. (+12.2%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests a strong performance forecast for Ryan Seggerman, possibly due to key factors that the model accounted for.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Quinn Vandecasteele than the current prediction. (-12.2%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests a potential downturn for Quinn Vandecasteele, possibly due to injuries or other negative factors.
Ryan Seggerman - Quinn Vandecasteele Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.67 ↑
(1.44) |
|
2.11 ↓
(2.63) |
7.5%
(7.6%) | |
What is the prediction for Ryan Seggerman - Quinn Vandecasteele?
Users Predictions:
4 users predict this event. Seggerman will win (votes: 4 - 100%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- The game of competitors is shaky now.
- Seggerman could have advantage in physics - more days for rest in last days.
- Seggerman will have a small advantage in this match.
- Last 1 head-to-head matches Seggerman won 0 matches, drawn 0 matches, lost 1 matches and goals 0-2.
How many head-to-head matches has Ryan Seggerman won against Quinn Vandecasteele?
Ryan Seggerman has won 0 of their last 1 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Quinn Vandecasteele won against Ryan Seggerman?
Quinn Vandecasteele has won 1 of their last 1 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Ryan Seggerman - Quinn Vandecasteele were as follows:
24.06.2023
Quinn Vandecasteele
-
Ryan Seggerman
2:0
Latest results of Ryan Seggerman
Latest results of Quinn Vandecasteele
Draw
Singles - QualificationSemi-finals| 1 | Wu Tung-Lin (1) | Kiger M. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Mayo K. (WC) | Matsuda R. (11) | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Mayo A. (2) | Kirchheimer S. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Hilderbrand T. (Alt) | Damm M. (9) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Rybakov A. (3) | Stephenson E. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Svajda T. | Huang T. (12) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Maloney P. (4) | Fenty A. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Weekes J. (Alt) | Dostanic S. (8) | 0 : 2 |
| 9 | Nakagawa N. (RET.) (5) | Suresh D. (CO) | 0 : 1 |
| 10 | Rankin M. (WC) | Ilagan A. (7) | 1 : 2 |
| 11 | Johns G. (6) | Ramanathan R. | 2 : 0 |
| 12 | Kumar P. (Alt) | Hussey G. (10) | 0 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Wu Tung-Lin (1) | Matsuda R. (11) | |
| 2 | Mayo A. (2) | Damm M. (9) | |
| 3 | Rybakov A. (3) | Svajda T. | |
| 4 | Maloney P. (4) | Dostanic S. (8) | |
| 5 | Suresh D. | Ilagan A. (7) | |
| 6 | Johns G. (6) | Hussey G. (10) | |
