Thijs Boogaard vs Hugo Grenier – Schedule & Where to Watch on TV

Result
1:2
08/02/2026 at 05:00 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
  • ATP - SINGLES: Rotterdam - Qualification, hard - Final

Match Stats

Aces
18
Double Faults
36
1st serve percentage
62%59%
1st serve points won
68% (40/59)70% (44/63)
2nd serve points won
47% (17/36)35% (15/43)
Break Points Saved
71% (10/14)55% (6/11)
1st return points won
30% (19/63)32% (19/59)
2nd return points won
65% (28/43)53% (19/36)
Break Points Converted
45% (5/11)29% (4/14)
Winners
3831
Unforced errors
4141
Net points won
62% (16/26)57% (20/35)
Service Points Won
60% (57/95)56% (59/106)
Return Points Won
44% (47/106)40% (38/95)
Total Points Won
52% (104/201)48% (97/201)
Last 10 balls
55
Match points saved
31
Service games won
73% (11/15)67% (10/15)
Return games won
33% (5/15)27% (4/15)
Total games won
53% (16/30)47% (14/30)

Chances of winning


Thijs Boogaard
29.4%
Hugo Grenier
70.6%

Initial Probability

(when we started the analysis)
35.2% 64.8%

Our Initial ML Estimation

28.1% 71.9%


Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:

  • Thijs Boogaard has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-5.8%)
  • Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Thijs Boogaard's form might have worsened.
  • Hugo Grenier has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+5.8%)
  • Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting Hugo Grenier's recent form is better than expected.
  • ML Model estimates a lower probability for Thijs Boogaard than the current prediction. (-1.3%)
  • ML Model estimates a higher probability for Hugo Grenier than the current prediction. (+1.3%)
  • Thijs Boogaard - Hugo Grenier Odds

    1 X 2 Marga
    Avarage Now
    (Initially)
    3.2
    (2.64)

    1.33
    (1.44)
    6.4%
    (7.6%)
    What is the prediction for Thijs Boogaard - Hugo Grenier?
  • High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 2 high ROI users predict this event. Grenier (votes: 2 - 100%).
  • Over/Under & Asian Handicap Predictions by High ROI users:
    • AH +1.5 Sets - Grenier (1.90) (votes: 1 - 100%) .
    • O/U 21 Games - under (votes: 1 - 100%) .
  • Overall votes from High ROI Users Predictions (including all markets): 3 high ROI users predict this event. Grenier (votes: 3 - 100%).
  • The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
  • Preview Facts
    • Boogaard is ranked ATP: 1052. Grenier is ranked ATP: 189.
    • Both players have been playing unpredictably.
    • Grenier may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
    • Grenier is expected to have a slight advantage in this match.
    • In recent times, the players did not meet on the field.
    Latest results of Thijs Boogaard
    Latest results of Hugo Grenier
    Draw
    Singles - Main

    1/16-finals
    1De Minaur A. (1)Fils A.2 : 0
    2Boogaard T. (LL)Wawrinka S. (WC)0 : 2
    3Pavlovic L. (Q)Van De Zandschulp B.0 : 2
    4Tsitsipas S.Rinderknech A. (8)2 : 0
    5Medvedev D. (4)Humbert U.1 : 2
    6Den Ouden G. (WC)Fucsovics M.2 : 0
    7Royer V.O'Connell C. (Q)1 : 2
    8Bautista-Agut R.Norrie C. (6)0 : 2
    9Khachanov K. (5)De Jong J.2 : 1
    10Budkov Kjaer N. (WC)Munar J.0 : 2
    11Grenier H. (Q)Struff J-L.0 : 2
    12Hurkacz H.Bublik A. (3)1 : 2
    13Griekspoor T. (7)Mpetshi Perricard G.2 : 0
    14Halys Q.Rottgering M. (Q)2 : 1
    15Bergs Z.Medjedovic H. (LL)0 : 2
    16Popyrin A.Auger-Aliassime F. (2)0 : 2

    1/8-finals
    1De Minaur A. (1)Wawrinka S.2 : 0
    2Van De Zandschulp B.Tsitsipas S.2 : 0
    3Humbert U.Den Ouden G.2 : 0
    4O'Connell C.Norrie C. (6)2 : 0
    5Khachanov K. (5)Munar J.1 : 2
    6Struff J-L.Bublik A. (3)1 : 2
    7Griekspoor T. (7)Halys Q.2 : 0
    8Medjedovic H.Auger-Aliassime F. (2)0 : 2

    Quarter-finals
    1De Minaur A. (1)Van De Zandschulp B.2 : 1
    2Humbert U.O'Connell C.2 : 0
    3Munar J.Bublik A. (3)1 : 2
    4Griekspoor T. (7)Auger-Aliassime F. (2)0 : 2

    Semi-finals
    1De Minaur A. (1)Humbert U.2 : 0
    2Bublik A. (3)Auger-Aliassime F. (2)0 : 2

    Final
    1De Minaur A. (1)Auger-Aliassime F. (2)2 : 0