Result
1:2
28/01/2025 at 12:00 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Cleveland (USA), hard (indoor) - 1/16-finals
Match Stats
| |
---|
Aces |
---|
2 | 14 |
Double Faults |
---|
2 | 10 |
1st Serve Percentage |
---|
67% | 57% |
1st Serve Points Won |
---|
57% (40/70) | 72% (39/54) |
2nd Serve Points Won |
---|
50% (17/34) | 46% (19/41) |
Break Points Saved |
---|
54% (7/13) | 43% (3/7) |
1st Return Points Won |
---|
28% (15/54) | 43% (30/70) |
2nd Return Points Won |
---|
54% (22/41) | 50% (17/34) |
Break Points Converted |
---|
57% (4/7) | 46% (6/13) |
Service Points Won |
---|
55% (57/104) | 61% (58/95) |
Return Points Won |
---|
39% (37/95) | 45% (47/104) |
Total Points Won |
---|
47% (94/199) | 53% (105/199) |
Last 10 Balls |
---|
4 | 6 |
Match Points Saved |
---|
1 | 0 |
Service Games Won |
---|
57% (8/14) | 71% (10/14) |
Return Games Won |
---|
29% (4/14) | 43% (6/14) |
Total Games Won |
---|
43% (12/28) | 57% (16/28) |
Chances of winning
Nathan Ponwith 35.3% | Trey Hilderbrand 64.7% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Nathan Ponwith has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+3.9%)Trey Hilderbrand has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-3.9%)
Nathan Ponwith - Trey Hilderbrand Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now (Initially) |
2.64 ↓ (2.96) |
|
1.44 ↑ (1.36) |
7.1% (7.6%) | |
What is the prediction for Nathan Ponwith - Trey Hilderbrand?
Users Predictions:
6 users predict this event. Ponwith will win (votes: 3 - 50%). Hilderbrand will win (votes: 3 - 50%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 0:2.
Preview Facts
- Ponwith is ranked ATP: 754. Hilderbrand is ranked ATP: 690.
- Hilderbrand is in a first-class shape now (in the last 5 games wins - 4).
- Hilderbrand could have advantage in physics - more days for rest in last days.
- In this match Hilderbrand is a favorite.
- Our prediction for today's Hilderbrand to win the game is with odds 1.39.
- Last 2 head-to-head matches Ponwith won 1 matches, drawn 0 matches, lost 1 matches and goals 3:2 (average 1.5:1).
How many head-to-head matches has Nathan Ponwith won against Trey Hilderbrand?
Nathan Ponwith has won 1 of their last 2 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Trey Hilderbrand won against Nathan Ponwith?
Trey Hilderbrand has won 1 of their last 2 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Nathan Ponwith - Trey Hilderbrand were as follows:
08.09.2024
Trey Hilderbrand
-
Nathan Ponwith
2:1
24.01.2024
Trey Hilderbrand
-
Nathan Ponwith
0:2
Latest results of Nathan Ponwith
Latest results of Trey Hilderbrand
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals1 | Gomez F. A. (1) | Cassone M. | 0 : 2 |
2 | Ross J. (Q) | Aguilar J. C. M. (Alt) | 0 : 2 |
3 | Mayo A. | Zink T. | 0 : 2 |
4 | Ivanovski K. (PR) | Holt B. (5) | 0 : 2 |
5 | Trotter J. K. (4) | Pieczonka F. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
6 | Ponwith N. (Q) | Hilderbrand T. (Q) | 1 : 2 |
7 | Mmoh M. | Rybakov A. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
8 | Escobedo E. | Spizzirri E. (6) | 0 : 2 |
9 | Sell K. (7) | Ayeni A. | 2 : 0 |
10 | Pinnington Jones J. | Kingsley C. | 0 : 2 |
11 | Seggerman R. | Dostanic S. | 0 : 2 |
12 | Smith C. | Quinn E. (3) | 2 : 1 |
13 | Wolf J.J. (8) | Brooksby J. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
14 | Ghibaudo A. (WC) | McCormick T. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
15 | Braswell M. | Kozlov S. | 1 : 2 |
16 | Bigun K. (WC) | Albot R. (2) | 2 : 0 |
1/8-finals1 | Cassone M. | Aguilar J. C. M. | 2 : 0 |
2 | Zink T. (WO.) | Holt B. (5) | |
3 | Trotter J. K. (4) | Hilderbrand T. | 2 : 1 |
4 | Mmoh M. | Spizzirri E. (6) | 0 : 2 |
5 | Sell K. (7) | Kingsley C. | 2 : 0 |
6 | Dostanic S. | Smith C. | 0 : 2 |
7 | Wolf J.J. (8) | Ghibaudo A. | 2 : 1 |
8 | Kozlov S. | Bigun K. | 2 : 0 |
Quarter-finals1 | Cassone M. | Zink T. | 1 : 2 |
2 | Trotter J. K. (4) | Spizzirri E. (6) | 1 : 2 |
3 | Sell K. (7) | Smith C. | 0 : 2 |
4 | Wolf J.J. (8) | Kozlov S. | 2 : 0 |
Semi-finals1 | Zink T. | Spizzirri E. (6) | 0 : 2 |
2 | Smith C. | Wolf J.J. (8) | 2 : 0 |
Final1 | Spizzirri E. (6) | Smith C. | 1 : 2 |