Result
0:2
12/02/2026 at 11:00 (Time Zone – GMT-5 (America/New_York))
- CHALLENGER MEN - SINGLES: Baton Rouge, hard - 1/8-finals
Match Stats
| |
|---|
| Aces |
|---|
| 5 | 6 |
| Double Faults |
|---|
| 2 | 1 |
| 1st serve percentage |
|---|
| 60% | 60% |
| 1st serve points won |
|---|
| 83% (35/42) | 75% (38/51) |
| 2nd serve points won |
|---|
| 43% (12/28) | 50% (17/34) |
| Break Points Saved |
|---|
| 67% (4/6) | 89% (8/9) |
| 1st return points won |
|---|
| 25% (13/51) | 17% (7/42) |
| 2nd return points won |
|---|
| 50% (17/34) | 57% (16/28) |
| Break Points Converted |
|---|
| 11% (1/9) | 33% (2/6) |
| Winners |
|---|
| 28 | 21 |
| Unforced errors |
|---|
| 38 | 27 |
| Net points won |
|---|
| 61% (11/18) | 47% (8/17) |
| Service Points Won |
|---|
| 67% (47/70) | 65% (55/85) |
| Return Points Won |
|---|
| 35% (30/85) | 33% (23/70) |
| Total Points Won |
|---|
| 50% (77/155) | 50% (78/155) |
| Last 10 balls |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
| Match points saved |
|---|
| 1 | 0 |
| Service games won |
|---|
| 82% (9/11) | 91% (10/11) |
| Return games won |
|---|
| 9% (1/11) | 18% (2/11) |
| Total games won |
|---|
| 45% (10/22) | 55% (12/22) |
Chances of winning
Tyler Zink
55.6% | Braden Shick
44.4% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Our Initial ML Estimation
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Tyler Zink has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+5.6%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Tyler Zink's performance.Braden Shick has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-5.6%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Braden Shick might be facing challenges that affect their performance.ML Model estimates a lower probability for Tyler Zink than the current prediction. (-7.6%)Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Tyler Zink that the model has picked up on.ML Model estimates a higher probability for Braden Shick than the current prediction. (+7.6%)Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Braden Shick could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
Tyler Zink - Braden Shick Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
1.67 ↓
(1.84) |
|
2.09 ↑
(1.84) |
7.7%
(8.6%) | |
What is the prediction for Tyler Zink - Braden Shick?
Users Predictions:
6 users predict this event. Zink will win (votes: 3 - 50%). Shick will win (votes: 3 - 50%). High ROI Users Predictions (ROI>2%): 2 high ROI users predict this event. Shick (votes: 2 - 100%). The most likely score by Bookmakers is 2:0.
Preview Facts
- Zink is ranked ATP: 330. Shick is ranked ATP: 483.
- In recent matches, Zink has shown inconsistent form (last 5 games: 2 wins).
- Shick is in superb shape, having picked up a string of victories recently (last 5 games: 5 wins).
- Zink may have a physical advantage due to more rest days in recent times.
- Recently, there has been no match between the players.
How many head-to-head matches has Tyler Zink won against Braden Shick?
Tyler Zink has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has Braden Shick won against Tyler Zink?
Braden Shick has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Tyler Zink - Braden Shick were as follows:
Latest results of Tyler Zink
Latest results of Braden Shick
Draw
Singles - Main1/16-finals| 1 | Galarneau A. (1) | Ozolins K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Ghibaudo A. | Kennedy J. (JR) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Perot R. | Corwin F. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Milavsky D. | Smith K. (8) | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Martin A. (3) | Kingsley C. | 0 : 2 |
| 6 | Arutiunian E. | Jones B. (LL) | 2 : 0 |
| 7 | Ilagan A. | Gima S. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Langmo C. | Johns G. (5) | 2 : 0 |
| 9 | Schachter N. (Q) | Pieczkowski O. | 0 : 2 |
| 10 | Vandecasteele Q. (WC) | Forbes M. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 11 | McCormick T. | Strombachs R. | 0 : 2 |
| 12 | Dostanic S. (Q) | George B. T. (LL) | 2 : 0 |
| 13 | Zink T. (7) | Azkara A. (Alt) | 2 : 0 |
| 14 | Fishback R. (Q) | Shick B. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 15 | Boulais J. (Alt) | Bicknell B. | 1 : 2 |
| 16 | Loncarevic A. (Q) | Andrade A. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Galarneau A. (1) | Kennedy J. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Perot R. | Milavsky D. | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Kingsley C. | Arutiunian E. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Ilagan A. | Langmo C. | 2 : 0 |
| 5 | Pieczkowski O. | Vandecasteele Q. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Strombachs R. | Dostanic S. | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Zink T. (7) | Shick B. | 0 : 2 |
| 8 | Bicknell B. | Andrade A. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Galarneau A. (1) | Milavsky D. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Kingsley C. | Ilagan A. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Pieczkowski O. | Dostanic S. | 0 : 2 |
| 4 | Shick B. | Andrade A. (WO.) (2) | |
Semi-finals| 1 | Galarneau A. (1) | Ilagan A. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Dostanic S. | Andrade A. (2) | 2 : 1 |
Final| 1 | Galarneau A. (1) | Dostanic S. | 0 : 2 |
