Result
0:2
28/08/2024 at 08:15 (Time Zone – GMT-4 (America/New_York))
- ITF MEN - SINGLES: M25 Oldenzaal (Netherlands), clay - 1/16-finals
Chances of winning
Yan Sabanin
18.6% | John Sperle
81.4% |
Initial Probability
(when we started the analysis)
Analysis of Changes in Winning Probabilities:
Yan Sabanin has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-6.4%)Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, indicating that Yan Sabanin's form might have worsened.John Sperle has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+6.4%)Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting John Sperle's recent form is better than expected.
Yan Sabanin - John Sperle Odds
|
1 |
X |
2 |
Marga |
|
Avarage Now
(Initially) |
5.01 ↑
(3.82) |
|
1.14 ↓
(1.27) |
7.7%
(4.9%) | |
Preview Facts
- Sabanin is ranked ATP: 1398. Sperle is ranked ATP: 679.
- Recent matches Sperle is playing changeable (in the last 5 games wins - 3).
- Sperle could have problems with physics compare with it opponent - last days they played more matches than their opponents.
- In this match Sperle is absolute favorite.
- Recently, the players did not play each other.
How many head-to-head matches has Yan Sabanin won against John Sperle?
Yan Sabanin has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
How many head-to-head matches has John Sperle won against Yan Sabanin?
John Sperle has won of their last 0 head-to-head matches.
What were the results of their latest head-to-head matches?
The latest head-to-head matches between Yan Sabanin - John Sperle were as follows:
Latest results of Yan Sabanin
Latest results of John Sperle
Draw
20241/16-finals| 1 | Houkes M. (1) | Paardekooper S. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Sabanin Y. (Q) | Sperle J. | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | George B. T. | Rubio Fierros A. F. | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | van d. H. T. (Q) | Wessels L. (6) | 0 : 2 |
| 5 | Durasovic V. (4) | Koenders R. (WC) | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Stuurman R. (Q) | Einig F. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 7 | Lootsma N. | Balciunas M. (WC) | 1 : 2 |
| 8 | Khoeblal E. | Bailly G. A. (7) | 2 : 1 |
| 9 | Vanshelboim E. (5) | Collignon K. (Q) | 2 : 0 |
| 10 | Verbeek D. (Q) | Den Heijer G. | 0 : 2 |
| 11 | Bozemoj B. | Raynel A. | 1 : 2 |
| 12 | Beaupain S. | Rosenkranz M. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 13 | Pontjodikromo S. (8) | Bidan F. (Q) | 2 : 1 |
| 14 | Forger A. (WC) | Schell N. | 2 : 0 |
| 15 | Whitehouse M. | Beckley A. | 1 : 2 |
| 16 | Vermeer W. (WC) | Kodat T. (2) | 0 : 2 |
1/8-finals| 1 | Houkes M. (1) | Sperle J. | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | George B. T. | Wessels L. (6) | 0 : 2 |
| 3 | Durasovic V. (4) | Stuurman R. | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | Balciunas M. | Khoeblal E. | 1 : 2 |
| 5 | Vanshelboim E. (5) | Den Heijer G. | 2 : 0 |
| 6 | Raynel A. | Rosenkranz M. (3) | 0 : 2 |
| 7 | Pontjodikromo S. (8) | Forger A. | 2 : 0 |
| 8 | Beckley A. | Kodat T. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Quarter-finals| 1 | Houkes M. (1) | Wessels L. (6) | 2 : 0 |
| 2 | Durasovic V. (4) | Khoeblal E. | 1 : 2 |
| 3 | Vanshelboim E. (5) | Rosenkranz M. (3) | 2 : 0 |
| 4 | Pontjodikromo S. (8) | Kodat T. (2) | 1 : 2 |
Semi-finals| 1 | Houkes M. (1) | Khoeblal E. | 2 : 1 |
| 2 | Vanshelboim E. (5) | Kodat T. (2) | 0 : 2 |
Final| 1 | Houkes M. (1) | Kodat T. (2) | 1 : 2 |
